1999 · Week 1

Final

Giants

New York

QB Kent Graham

17·13

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Trent Dilfer

Raymond James Stadium · outdoors · grass · 88°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

TB -5.5

Total

37.5

Model margin

+4.5est.

TB perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Buccaneers
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Buccaneers winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapBuccaneers
  • -0.084EPA / play-0.149
  • 38.6%Success rate35.1%
  • -0.016EPA / dropback-0.110
  • -0.207EPA / rush-0.193
  • 6.4%Explosive rate7.7%
  • 35.7%Third-down rate35.3%
  • 50.7%Red-zone TD rate37.2%
  • 1.14Points / drive1.03
  • 2.8%Turnover rate3.3%
  • -0.039EPA / play allowed-0.164

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 8–5 since 1999

TB have won 3 straight. Meetings average 44.5 points. TB are 3-8-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W12TB @ NYG307TB
2021 · W11NYG @ TB1030TB
2020 · W8TB @ NYG2523TB
2019 · W3NYG @ TB3231NYG
2018 · W11TB @ NYG3538NYG
2017 · W4NYG @ TB2325TB
2015 · W9NYG @ TB3218NYG
2012 · W2TB @ NYG3441NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kent Graham12/249100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Sean Bennett13241.80
Kent Graham620.30

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Trent Dilfer15/3117413
Eric Zeier3/111401

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Warrick Dunn15463.10
Jacquez Green11515.00
Trent Dilfer144.00
Rabih Abdullah100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Buccaneers; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

3.18%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.1%

Expected total

42.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.56
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.39
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.51