1999 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Browns

Cleveland

QB Tim Couch

9·26

Titans

Tennessee

QB Neil O'Donnell

Adelphia Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 86°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

TEN -16

Total

40

Model margin

+6.8est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

1.7%est.

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Browns

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsBrowns wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Brownsedge mapTitans
  • -0.110EPA / play+0.007
  • 35.3%Success rate40.1%
  • -0.079EPA / dropback+0.067
  • -0.177EPA / rush-0.083
  • 6.6%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 29.7%Third-down rate39.0%
  • 74.3%Red-zone TD rate58.0%
  • 1.12Points / drive1.52
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.1%
  • +0.100EPA / play allowed-0.042

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TEN lead 11–7 since 1999

Meetings average 46.8 points. TEN are 8-9-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W14TEN @ CLE3129TEN
2023 · W3TEN @ CLE327CLE
2020 · W13CLE @ TEN4135CLE
2019 · W1TEN @ CLE4313TEN
2017 · W7TEN @ CLE129TEN
2016 · W6CLE @ TEN2628TEN
2015 · W2TEN @ CLE1428CLE
2014 · W5CLE @ TEN2928CLE

Box score

Individual performances

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tim Couch12/2413410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Couch5408.00
Terry Kirby10404.00
Sedrick Shaw133.00

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Neil O'Donnell31/4031010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George31973.12
Rodney Thomas166.00
Neil O'Donnell2-1-0.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +167.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%2.6%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Browns.

Half-point at risk

1.66%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.8%

Expected total

46.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.08
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.12
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.76