Closing spread
CLE -1.5
Total
36.5
Model margin
+0.2est.
TEN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Browns
- OutDillon GabrielQBBack· Full
- OutKalia DavisDTQuadricep· DNP
- OutMike Hall Jr.DTAnkle· DNP
- OutTeven JenkinsGBack· DNP
- QuestionableDenzel WardCBHand· Limited
- QuestionableQuincy WilliamsLBNeck· Limited
- LimitedCarson SchwesingerLBAnkle
- LimitedGrant DelpitSConcussion
Titans
- QuestionableCalvin RidleyWRHip· DNP
- QuestionableDorian MausiLBFoot· Full
- QuestionableKevin Winston Jr.SQuadricep· Limited
- QuestionableTony AdamsSAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableTyjae SpearsRBNot injury related - resting player· Limited
Win probability
- Titans
- Browns
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.040EPA / play-0.124
- 42.7%Success rate40.2%
- +0.039EPA / dropback-0.123
- -0.175EPA / rush-0.126
- 7.8%Explosive rate6.3%
- -1.22CPOE-0.37
- 32.8%Third-down rate34.7%
- 59.3%Red-zone TD rate47.4%
- 1.65Points / drive1.42
- 1.8%Turnover rate2.0%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
TEN lead 11–8 since 1999
Meetings average 47 points. TEN are 8-10-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CLE–TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 75 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CLE | Q1 12:57 | 5 | 21 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| TEN | Q1 10:41 | 4 | 24 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| CLE | Q1 8:35 | 6 | 73 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| TEN | Q1 5:32 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 7–14 |
| CLE | Q1 4:12 | 4 | 7 | Punt | 7–14 |
| TEN | Q1 2:30 | 14 | 50 | Turnover on downs | 7–14 |
| CLE | Q2 9:34 | 6 | 39 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| TEN | Q2 7:07 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| CLE | Q2 7:01 | 9 | 73 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| TEN | Q2 2:17 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–14 |
| CLE | Q2 1:45 | 9 | 64 | Field goal | 17–14 |
| CLE | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 28 | Punt | 17–14 |
| TEN | Q3 11:17 | 6 | 17 | Turnover | 17–14 |
| CLE | Q3 8:26 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 17–14 |
| TEN | Q3 6:28 | 6 | 30 | Punt | 17–14 |
| CLE | Q3 3:35 | 8 | 62 | Missed field goal | 17–14 |
| TEN | Q4 14:04 | 9 | 56 | Field goal | 17–17 |
| CLE | Q4 8:41 | 8 | 71 | Touchdown | 24–17 |
| TEN | Q4 4:34 | 11 | 63 | Touchdown | 24–24 |
| CLE | Q4 0:58 | 3 | 50 | Field goal | 27–24 |
Box score
Individual performances
Browns
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson | 25/36 | 308 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinshon Judkins | 17 | 96 | 5.6 | 2 |
| Dylan Sampson | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 0 |
| KC Concepcion | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 |
| Deshaun Watson | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC Concepcion | 8 | 10 | 129 | 0 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 6 | 9 | 91 | 0 |
| Dylan Sampson | 3 | 3 | 32 | 0 |
| Denzel Boston | 3 | 8 | 27 | 0 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 |
| Quinshon Judkins | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Ward | 20/31 | 181 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Pollard | 25 | 129 | 5.2 | 3 |
| Michael Carter | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 |
| Cam Ward | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnell Tate | 5 | 7 | 69 | 0 |
| Elic Ayomanor | 3 | 7 | 44 | 0 |
| Tony Pollard | 3 | 3 | 26 | 0 |
| Gunnar Helm | 3 | 4 | 24 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Wan'Dale Robinson | 4 | 6 | 7 | 0 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Browns.
Half-point at risk
2.15%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
49.6%
Expected total
42.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.00
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.22



