1999 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Steelers

Pittsburgh

QB Kordell Stewart

23·20

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Scott Mitchell

PSINet Stadium · outdoors · grass · 74°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

PIT -2.5

Total

38

Model margin

+5.2est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Steelers

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsSteelers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Steelersedge mapRavens
  • -0.063EPA / play-0.091
  • 41.6%Success rate36.5%
  • -0.073EPA / dropback-0.084
  • -0.048EPA / rush-0.100
  • 6.4%Explosive rate7.5%
  • 37.4%Third-down rate28.4%
  • 52.5%Red-zone TD rate40.6%
  • 1.27Points / drive1.00
  • 2.2%Turnover rate2.7%
  • -0.045EPA / play allowed-0.151

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

PIT lead 33–26 since 1999

PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 39.4 points. BAL are 26-30-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18BAL @ PIT2426PIT
2025 · W14PIT @ BAL2722PIT
2024 · playoffsPIT @ BAL1428BAL
2024 · W16PIT @ BAL1734BAL
2024 · W11BAL @ PIT1618PIT
2023 · W18PIT @ BAL1710PIT
2023 · W5BAL @ PIT1017PIT
2022 · W17PIT @ BAL1613PIT

Box score

Individual performances

Steelers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kordell Stewart18/2713800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kordell Stewart8516.41
Richard Huntley10494.91
Jerome Bettis16462.90
Hines Ward133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Courtney Hawkins68540
Troy Edwards57380
Hines Ward25310
Richard Huntley23100
Mark Bruener2340

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Stoney Case7/1513010
Scott Mitchell7/164802

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Errict Rhett221014.61
Chuck Evans4133.30
Stoney Case188.00
Priest Holmes122.00
Scott Mitchell111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.53.4%6.4%7.4%3.2%4.9%3.3%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Steelers.

Half-point at risk

1.88%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.9%

Expected total

44.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.66
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.22