1999 · Week 3

Final

49ers

San Francisco

QB Steve Young

24·10

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

Sun Devil Stadium · outdoors · grass · 97°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

SF -2.5

Total

45.5

Model margin

+4.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

49ersedge mapCardinals
  • -0.036EPA / play-0.176
  • 41.7%Success rate35.9%
  • -0.026EPA / dropback-0.148
  • -0.054EPA / rush-0.226
  • 8.5%Explosive rate5.9%
  • 34.4%Third-down rate33.3%
  • 42.7%Red-zone TD rate53.1%
  • 1.14Points / drive0.87
  • 2.8%Turnover rate3.8%
  • +0.079EPA / play allowed-0.001

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SF lead 28–22 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.8 points. ARI are 23-26-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11SF @ ARI4122SF
2025 · W3ARI @ SF1516SF
2024 · W18SF @ ARI2447ARI
2024 · W5ARI @ SF2423ARI
2023 · W15SF @ ARI4529SF
2023 · W4ARI @ SF1635SF
2022 · W18ARI @ SF1338SF
2022 · W11SF @ ARI3810SF

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve Young13/239211
Jeff Garcia5/63000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lawrence Phillips910211.31
Charlie Garner21753.61
Steve Young2199.50
Jeff Garcia393.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Terrell Owens45590
Jerry Rice310281
Lawrence Phillips34150
Mark Harris1170
J.J. Stokes2240
Chad Fann0100
Charlie Garner3300

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer16/3117602

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Murrell16422.60
Michael Pittman6355.80
Jake Plummer5204.00
Mario Bates111.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.53.6%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

1.92%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.2%

Expected total

46.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.52
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.49
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.54