Closing spread
SF -7.5
Total
48.5
Model margin
+5.4est.
SF perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Cardinals
- OutDadrion Taylor-DemersonSBack· DNP
- QuestionableMax MeltonCBToe· Limited
- QuestionableRoy LopezDTGroin· Limited
49ers
- OutDemarcus RobinsonWRAnkle· DNP
- OutJames Thompson Jr.DTAnkle· DNP
- OutNick BosaDEKnee· DNP
- OutRomello HeightDEHand· DNP
- QuestionableMike EvansWRHip· Limited
Win probability
- 49ers
- Cardinals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.007EPA / play+0.153
- 44.1%Success rate52.5%
- +0.027EPA / dropback+0.265
- -0.072EPA / rush-0.001
- 5.2%Explosive rate10.8%
- +0.66CPOE+4.63
- 39.0%Third-down rate51.0%
- 52.3%Red-zone TD rate88.6%
- 1.94Points / drive2.81
- 1.4%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SF lead 29–22 since 1999
SF have won 3 straight. Meetings average 45.3 points. SF are 26-24-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ARI–SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 13 | 42 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 9:18 | 3 | 85 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| ARI | Q1 8:26 | 7 | 23 | Punt | 0–7 |
| SF | Q1 5:11 | 11 | 88 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| ARI | Q2 14:55 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 0–14 |
| SF | Q2 12:07 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–14 |
| ARI | Q2 11:12 | 14 | 64 | Field goal | 3–14 |
| SF | Q2 3:03 | 6 | 15 | Punt | 3–14 |
| ARI | Q2 1:30 | 7 | 44 | Field goal | 6–14 |
| SF | Q2 0:23 | 2 | 34 | Field goal | 6–17 |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 56 | Touchdown | 6–23 |
| ARI | Q3 11:07 | 14 | 69 | Touchdown | 13–23 |
| SF | Q3 3:02 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 13–23 |
| ARI | Q3 0:56 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 13–23 |
| ARI | Q3 0:31 | 6 | 9 | Touchdown | 20–23 |
| SF | Q4 13:06 | 10 | 64 | Touchdown | 20–29 |
| ARI | Q4 8:42 | 14 | 68 | Touchdown | 27–29 |
| SF | Q4 2:51 | 7 | 75 | Touchdown | 27–36 |
| ARI | Q4 1:31 | 3 | 35 | Field goal | 30–36 |
| SF | Q4 0:34 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 30–36 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacoby Brissett | 38/52 | 280 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremiyah Love | 21 | 90 | 4.3 | 0 |
| Jacoby Brissett | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 1 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Wilson | 11 | 17 | 89 | 1 |
| Trey McBride | 9 | 11 | 75 | 0 |
| Marvin Harrison Jr. | 3 | 5 | 40 | 0 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| Elijah Higgins | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Jeremiyah Love | 5 | 5 | 19 | 1 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 4 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Hunter Long | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Jalen Brooks | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brock Purdy | 15/27 | 297 | 4 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffrey | 15 | 75 | 5.0 | 1 |
| Brock Purdy | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 |
| Kaelon Black | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 0 |
| Deebo Samuel Sr. | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Kittle | 6 | 7 | 82 | 2 |
| Jordan Watkins | 2 | 2 | 60 | 0 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 4 | 5 | 41 | 0 |
| Mike Evans | 3 | 6 | 34 | 1 |
| Luke Farrell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jacob Cowing | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Kaelon Black | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Cardinals.
Half-point at risk
2.21%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
63.4%
Expected total
45.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.18
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.40



