1999 · Week 4

Final

Saints

New Orleans

QB Billy Joe Hobert

10·14

Bears

Chicago

QB Shane Matthews

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 49°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

NO -1

Total

37

Model margin

+1.6est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Saints

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsSaints wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Saintsedge mapBears
  • -0.148EPA / play-0.102
  • 36.9%Success rate38.6%
  • -0.081EPA / dropback-0.043
  • -0.247EPA / rush-0.228
  • 7.7%Explosive rate7.4%
  • 34.1%Third-down rate37.0%
  • 45.0%Red-zone TD rate44.0%
  • 1.12Points / drive1.03
  • 3.4%Turnover rate3.1%
  • +0.007EPA / play allowed-0.001

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NO lead 11–6 since 1999

Meetings average 43.2 points. CHI are 7-9-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W7NO @ CHI1426CHI
2023 · W9CHI @ NO1724NO
2020 · playoffsCHI @ NO921NO
2020 · W8NO @ CHI2623NO
2019 · W7NO @ CHI3625NO
2017 · W8CHI @ NO1220NO
2014 · W15NO @ CHI3115NO
2013 · W5NO @ CHI2618NO

Box score

Individual performances

Saints

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Billy Joe Tolliver7/1510200
Billy Joe Hobert8/137600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Williams21844.00
Billy Joe Tolliver23216.00
Lamar Smith10191.90
Billy Joe Hobert122.01

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shane Matthews25/3922422
Cade McNown0/4000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Curtis Enis23833.60
Shane Matthews3237.70
James Allen144.00
Cade McNown122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -14.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Saints.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.4%

Expected total

43.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.77
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-1.18
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+1.59