Closing spread
NO -1
Total
37
Model margin
+1.6est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Win probability
- Bears
- Saints
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.148EPA / play-0.102
- 36.9%Success rate38.6%
- -0.081EPA / dropback-0.043
- -0.247EPA / rush-0.228
- 7.7%Explosive rate7.4%
- 34.1%Third-down rate37.0%
- 45.0%Red-zone TD rate44.0%
- 1.12Points / drive1.03
- 3.4%Turnover rate3.1%
- +0.007EPA / play allowed-0.001
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NO lead 11–6 since 1999
Meetings average 43.2 points. CHI are 7-9-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NO–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 | 0 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 28 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NO | Q1 11:03 | 5 | -11 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 7:42 | 10 | 33 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| NO | Q1 3:20 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 1:56 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NO | Q1 1:01 | 2 | 21 | — | 0–0 |
| NO | Q2 | 0 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NO | Q2 15:00 | 7 | 28 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q2 11:35 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NO | Q2 9:57 | 13 | 52 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q2 4:32 | 5 | 22 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NO | Q2 1:53 | 4 | 13 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q2 0:39 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NO | Q2 0:03 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–0 |
| NO | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q3 13:25 | 11 | 40 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| NO | Q3 8:25 | 6 | 51 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q3 5:53 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| NO | Q3 5:41 | 4 | 27 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q3 3:23 | 1 | -9 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| NO | Q3 3:10 | 5 | 9 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q3 1:09 | 3 | 6 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| NO | Q3 0:26 | 5 | 5 | Turnover on downs | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q4 14:08 | 11 | 37 | Missed field goal | 10–0 |
| NO | Q4 9:21 | 8 | 57 | Turnover on downs | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q4 4:35 | 10 | 79 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| NO | Q4 1:48 | 4 | 17 | Punt | 10–7 |
| CHI | Q4 1:08 | 6 | 67 | Touchdown | 10–14 |
| NO | Q4 0:07 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 10–14 |
Box score
Individual performances
Saints
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billy Joe Tolliver | 7/15 | 102 | 0 | 0 |
| Billy Joe Hobert | 8/13 | 76 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricky Williams | 21 | 84 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Billy Joe Tolliver | 2 | 32 | 16.0 | 0 |
| Lamar Smith | 10 | 19 | 1.9 | 0 |
| Billy Joe Hobert | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie Kennison | 4 | 8 | 55 | 0 |
| Keith Poole | 2 | 6 | 45 | 0 |
| Lamar Smith | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
| Andre Hastings | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
| Cameron Cleeland | 1 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Scott Slutzker | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Ricky Williams | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Brett Bech | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shane Matthews | 25/39 | 224 | 2 | 2 |
| Cade McNown | 0/4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Enis | 23 | 83 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Shane Matthews | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 |
| James Allen | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Cade McNown | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Conway | 8 | 12 | 103 | 2 |
| Ryan Wetnight | 6 | 7 | 47 | 0 |
| Bobby Engram | 4 | 7 | 33 | 0 |
| Edgar Bennett | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Marcus Robinson | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Macey Brooks | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Alonzo Mayes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Curtis Enis | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Saints.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
53.4%
Expected total
43.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.77
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-1.18
- Rest differential-0.56
- Expected margin+1.59



