1999 · Week 5 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Shane Matthews

24·22

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Randall Cunningham

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -13

Total

43.5

Model margin

+0.7est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

1.4%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.102EPA / play+0.042
  • 38.6%Success rate44.6%
  • -0.043EPA / dropback+0.128
  • -0.228EPA / rush-0.092
  • 7.4%Explosive rate10.9%
  • 37.0%Third-down rate44.4%
  • 44.0%Red-zone TD rate57.8%
  • 1.03Points / drive1.72
  • 3.1%Turnover rate3.4%
  • -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.008

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shane Matthews19/2818420
Cade McNown9/149700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Curtis Enis27662.40
Cade McNown2178.50
Edgar Bennett11515.00
Shane Matthews166.00
James Allen111.00
Glyn Milburn1-4-4.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Randall Cunningham25/4630913

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Robert Smith121078.90
Randall Cunningham34214.00
Leroy Hoard5173.40

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Randy Moss8111220
Cris Carter512620
Andrew Glover58480
Leroy Hoard11290
Jake Reed14230
Matt Hatchette12220
Chris Walsh11181
Robert Smith12-20
Jimmy Kleinsasser23-130

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +137.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.45%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

50.9%

Expected total

44.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.50
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-4.40
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.67