Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2022 · Week 18 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Kirk Cousins

29·13

Bears

Chicago

QB Nathan Peterman

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 32°F · wind 2mph

Closing spread

MIN -6.5

Total

42.5

Model margin

+1.2est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • +0.004EPA / play-0.039
  • 45.8%Success rate41.1%
  • +0.070EPA / dropback-0.070
  • -0.130EPA / rush-0.004
  • 8.0%Explosive rate10.4%
  • +1.66CPOE-4.05
  • 40.7%Third-down rate41.0%
  • 65.2%Red-zone TD rate60.7%
  • 2.04Points / drive1.78
  • 2.0%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN
2021 · W18CHI @ MIN1731MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins17/2022510
Nick Mullens11/1311601

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alexander Mattison10545.42
Dalvin Cook11373.40
Ty Chandler6203.30
Kene Nwangwu5132.60
Nick Mullens482.00
Jalen Reagor155.00
Adam Thielen144.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Nathan Peterman11/1911410
Tim Boyle2/83302

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Khalil Herbert10505.00
Velus Jones Jr.14242.01
David Montgomery7213.00
Nathan Peterman273.50
Tim Boyle2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -6.54.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.81%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.3%

Expected total

45.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.17
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.66
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.19