Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2026 · Week 2 · Division

Scheduled

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Kyler Murray

@

Bears

Chicago

QB Caleb Williams

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass

Closing spread

CHI -4.5

Total

47.5

Model margin

+3.1est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • +0.055EPA / play+0.361
  • 37.7%Success rate53.3%
  • +0.208EPA / dropback+0.551
  • -0.125EPA / rush+0.143
  • 3.3%Explosive rate12.0%
  • -4.89CPOE+16.58
  • 57.1%Third-down rate71.4%
  • 83.3%Red-zone TD rate100.0%
  • 2.90Points / drive4.19
  • 1.6%Turnover rate1.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +4.53.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

1.95%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.4%

Expected total

49.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.89
  • Home-field advantage+2.22
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.11