1999 · Week 10 · Division

Final

49ers

San Francisco

QB Steve Stenstrom

6·24

Saints

New Orleans

QB Billy Joe Tolliver

Louisiana Superdome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

SF -1

Total

38.5

Model margin

+6.6est.

NO perspective

Push chance

1.9%est.

Win probability

  • Saints
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Saints wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

49ersedge mapSaints
  • -0.036EPA / play-0.148
  • 41.7%Success rate36.9%
  • -0.026EPA / dropback-0.081
  • -0.054EPA / rush-0.247
  • 8.5%Explosive rate7.7%
  • 34.4%Third-down rate34.1%
  • 42.7%Red-zone TD rate45.0%
  • 1.14Points / drive1.12
  • 2.8%Turnover rate3.4%
  • +0.079EPA / play allowed+0.007

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NO lead 12–9 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 49.9 points. NO are 11-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W2SF @ NO2621SF
2022 · W12NO @ SF013SF
2020 · W10SF @ NO1327NO
2019 · W14SF @ NO4846SF
2016 · W9NO @ SF4123NO
2014 · W10SF @ NO2724SF
2013 · W11SF @ NO2023NO
2012 · W12SF @ NO3121SF

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve Stenstrom18/3215701

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Charlie Garner12605.00
Steve Stenstrom188.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Terrell Owens59560
J.J. Stokes47350
Jerry Rice45310
Greg Clark1380
Charlie Garner2380
Mark Harris0100

Saints

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Billy Joe Tolliver12/1524210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Williams30993.30
Billy Joe Tolliver6366.02
Lamar Smith382.70

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Keith Poole23740
Ricky Williams33570
Andre Hastings22531
Eddie Kennison35410
Scott Slutzker11110
Lamar Smith1160

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -13.2%6.0%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%

Positive margins favour Saints; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

1.88%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.4%

Expected total

46.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.45
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+5.50
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.61