Closing spread
TEN -10
Total
41
Model margin
+0.2est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
2.7%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Bengals
- Titans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.007EPA / play-0.068
- 40.1%Success rate39.4%
- +0.067EPA / dropback-0.034
- -0.083EPA / rush-0.132
- 8.5%Explosive rate7.1%
- 39.0%Third-down rate39.2%
- 58.0%Red-zone TD rate43.1%
- 1.52Points / drive1.24
- 2.1%Turnover rate2.4%
- -0.042EPA / play allowed+0.041
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 10–10 since 1999
CIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45.1 points. CIN are 12-7-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TEN–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 71 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 10:24 | 4 | 18 | Punt | 7–0 |
| TEN | Q1 8:00 | 5 | 13 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 5:39 | 5 | 9 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| TEN | Q1 2:49 | 5 | 12 | Touchdown | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q1 0:14 | 3 | -13 | Punt | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q2 13:36 | 4 | 6 | Turnover on downs | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q2 11:35 | 4 | 8 | Turnover on downs | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q2 9:31 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q2 7:39 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q2 5:43 | 5 | 22 | Punt | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q2 3:02 | 11 | 69 | Missed field goal | 14–6 |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 14–7 |
| TEN | Q3 14:42 | 4 | 13 | Punt | 14–7 |
| CIN | Q3 12:11 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–7 |
| TEN | Q3 10:41 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 14–7 |
| CIN | Q3 8:29 | 3 | 6 | Turnover | 14–7 |
| TEN | Q3 7:28 | 2 | 16 | Touchdown | 21–7 |
| CIN | Q3 7:05 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 21–7 |
| TEN | Q3 6:53 | 7 | 30 | Field goal | 24–7 |
| CIN | Q3 2:26 | 3 | -8 | Punt | 24–7 |
| TEN | Q3 0:45 | 4 | 18 | Turnover | 24–7 |
| CIN | Q4 14:09 | 8 | 64 | Turnover on downs | 24–7 |
| TEN | Q4 10:20 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 24–7 |
| CIN | Q4 8:55 | 10 | 55 | Turnover | 24–7 |
| TEN | Q4 5:43 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 24–7 |
| CIN | Q4 4:02 | 4 | 46 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| TEN | Q4 2:38 | 4 | 26 | End of half | 24–14 |
Box score
Individual performances
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve McNair | 12/25 | 103 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie George | 29 | 123 | 4.2 | 2 |
| Steve McNair | 5 | 14 | 2.8 | 1 |
| Rodney Thomas | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Dyson | 4 | 9 | 39 | 0 |
| Yancey Thigpen | 2 | 5 | 30 | 0 |
| Jackie Harris | 3 | 5 | 21 | 0 |
| Isaac Byrd | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Frank Wycheck | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Eddie George | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Blake | 18/32 | 236 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Blake | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Corey Dillon | 14 | 33 | 2.4 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnay Scott | 5 | 8 | 85 | 1 |
| Tony McGee | 2 | 2 | 49 | 0 |
| Corey Dillon | 3 | 4 | 37 | 0 |
| Carl Pickens | 4 | 7 | 28 | 0 |
| Willie Jackson | 2 | 5 | 17 | 0 |
| Marco Battaglia | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Titans.
Half-point at risk
2.68%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
49.5%
Expected total
45.7est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.40
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.16



