Closing spread
CIN -1
Total
43
Model margin
-1.4est.
TEN perspective
Push chance
2.2%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bengals
- OutJoe MixonRBConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableDax HillSShoulder· Full
- QuestionableJa'Marr ChaseWRHip· Limited
- QuestionableJoe BachieLBKnee· Limited
- QuestionableJosh TupouDTCalf· Full
Titans
- OutDenico AutryDEKnee· DNP
- QuestionableBen JonesCConcussion· Full
- QuestionableHassan HaskinsRBHip· Limited
- QuestionableJeffery SimmonsDTAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableKristian FultonCBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableRandy BullockKright Calf· DNP
Win probability
- Titans
- Bengals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.081EPA / play-0.066
- 47.8%Success rate41.2%
- +0.153EPA / dropback-0.034
- -0.064EPA / rush-0.104
- 7.4%Explosive rate8.9%
- +2.74CPOE-0.94
- 47.3%Third-down rate37.1%
- 72.1%Red-zone TD rate67.5%
- 2.27Points / drive1.46
- 1.6%Turnover rate2.0%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 10–10 since 1999
CIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45.1 points. TEN are 7-12-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CIN–TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 31 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 11:50 | 7 | 41 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 7:26 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 6:36 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 5:08 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 3:07 | 9 | 39 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| CIN | Q2 14:06 | 6 | 47 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| TEN | Q2 11:30 | 1 | 69 | Touchdown | 3–10 |
| CIN | Q2 11:15 | 4 | 9 | Punt | 3–10 |
| TEN | Q2 9:09 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 3–10 |
| CIN | Q2 7:29 | 9 | 92 | Touchdown | 10–10 |
| TEN | Q2 1:55 | 10 | 68 | Missed field goal | 10–10 |
| CIN | Q2 0:04 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–10 |
| TEN | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 10–10 |
| CIN | Q3 13:38 | 4 | 9 | Punt | 10–10 |
| TEN | Q3 11:36 | 6 | 19 | Punt | 10–10 |
| CIN | Q3 7:54 | 13 | 58 | Field goal | 13–10 |
| TEN | Q3 2:35 | 4 | 57 | Field goal | 13–13 |
| CIN | Q3 0:39 | 7 | 70 | Touchdown | 20–13 |
| TEN | Q4 13:42 | 11 | 55 | Field goal | 20–16 |
| CIN | Q4 6:07 | 9 | 62 | End of half | 20–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow | 22/37 | 270 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samaje Perine | 17 | 58 | 3.4 | 1 |
| Joe Burrow | 9 | 32 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tee Higgins | 7 | 9 | 114 | 1 |
| Hayden Hurst | 6 | 9 | 57 | 0 |
| Samaje Perine | 4 | 7 | 35 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| Tyler Boyd | 2 | 4 | 16 | 0 |
| Trenton Irwin | 1 | 4 | 16 | 0 |
| Trent Taylor | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Tannehill | 22/34 | 291 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 17 | 38 | 2.2 | 0 |
| Dontrell Hilliard | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Ryan Tannehill | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 3 | 3 | 79 | 0 |
| Treylon Burks | 4 | 6 | 70 | 0 |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 4 | 6 | 58 | 0 |
| Chig Okonkwo | 3 | 5 | 35 | 0 |
| Austin Hooper | 3 | 4 | 30 | 0 |
| Robert Woods | 2 | 6 | 16 | 0 |
| Dontrell Hilliard | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Geoff Swaim | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Bengals.
Half-point at risk
2.16%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
45.3%
Expected total
43.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.34
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin-1.39



