Closing spread
NYG -4.5
Total
34.5
Model margin
+3.9est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Giants
- Cardinals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.176EPA / play-0.084
- 35.9%Success rate38.6%
- -0.148EPA / dropback-0.016
- -0.226EPA / rush-0.207
- 5.9%Explosive rate6.4%
- 33.3%Third-down rate35.7%
- 53.1%Red-zone TD rate50.7%
- 0.87Points / drive1.14
- 3.8%Turnover rate2.8%
- -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.039
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 9–9 since 1999
NYG have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.9 points. NYG are 6-12 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ARI–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 13:57 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 13:08 | 4 | 12 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 11:46 | 11 | 26 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| NYG | Q1 5:54 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 3–0 |
| ARI | Q1 3:43 | 3 | 0 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| NYG | Q1 2:58 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 3–0 |
| ARI | Q1 1:57 | 9 | 43 | Punt | 3–0 |
| NYG | Q2 11:56 | 11 | 88 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| ARI | Q2 6:24 | 9 | 69 | Field goal | 6–7 |
| NYG | Q2 1:51 | 8 | 66 | Field goal | 6–10 |
| ARI | Q2 0:02 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 6–10 |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 6–10 |
| NYG | Q3 13:26 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 6–10 |
| ARI | Q3 13:16 | 5 | 16 | Touchdown | 13–10 |
| NYG | Q3 11:50 | 3 | 0 | Turnover | 13–10 |
| ARI | Q3 10:49 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 13–10 |
| NYG | Q3 9:50 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 13–10 |
| ARI | Q3 8:54 | 7 | 15 | Turnover on downs | 13–10 |
| NYG | Q3 5:39 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 13–10 |
| ARI | Q3 4:37 | 9 | 62 | Touchdown | 20–10 |
| NYG | Q4 14:55 | 14 | 81 | Touchdown | 20–17 |
| ARI | Q4 8:51 | 9 | 60 | Touchdown | 27–17 |
| NYG | Q4 4:16 | 2 | -12 | Turnover | 27–17 |
| ARI | Q4 3:37 | 3 | 6 | Missed field goal | 27–17 |
| NYG | Q4 2:35 | 3 | 16 | Opp touchdown | 34–17 |
| ARI | Q4 1:57 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 34–17 |
| NYG | Q4 1:57 | 5 | 70 | Touchdown | 34–24 |
| ARI | Q4 0:42 | 1 | -1 | End of half | 34–24 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dave Brown | 11/17 | 126 | 0 | 0 |
| Jake Plummer | 12/18 | 125 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Bates | 16 | 37 | 2.3 | 1 |
| Adrian Murrell | 15 | 28 | 1.9 | 0 |
| Dave Brown | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Jake Plummer | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rob Moore | 7 | 9 | 102 | 1 |
| Frank Sanders | 6 | 8 | 73 | 0 |
| Adrian Murrell | 5 | 10 | 50 | 0 |
| David Boston | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Johnny McWilliams | 1 | 4 | 9 | 1 |
| Mac Cody | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Terry Hardy | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Collins | 22/45 | 298 | 1 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 10 | 37 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Sean Bennett | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 1 |
| Kerry Collins | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 |
| LeShon Johnson | 3 | -2 | -0.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amani Toomer | 6 | 9 | 87 | 0 |
| Ike Hilliard | 4 | 12 | 72 | 0 |
| Tiki Barber | 3 | 7 | 64 | 1 |
| Pete Mitchell | 5 | 7 | 47 | 0 |
| David Patten | 2 | 5 | 21 | 0 |
| Sean Bennett | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Greg Comella | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Cardinals.
Half-point at risk
1.97%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
59.5%
Expected total
44.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.46
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-0.13
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+3.89



