Closing spread
NYG -5
Total
40
Model margin
-0.2est.
ARI perspective
Push chance
1.9%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Giants
- DoubtfulAzeez OjulariDEHamstring· Limited
- DoubtfulWan'Dale RobinsonWRKnee· Limited
- QuestionableAndrew ThomasTHamstring· Limited
- LimitedDarren WallerTEHamstring
Cardinals
- OutJosh WoodsLBAnkle· DNP
- OutL.J. CollierDEBiceps· DNP
- QuestionableBudda BakerSHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableKelvin BeachumTHand· Limited
- QuestionableLeki FotuDTShoulder· Limited
Win probability
- Cardinals
- Giants
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.165EPA / play-0.055
- 38.2%Success rate41.0%
- -0.143EPA / dropback-0.082
- -0.205EPA / rush-0.014
- 7.6%Explosive rate9.3%
- +0.19CPOE-2.77
- 30.9%Third-down rate39.6%
- 45.8%Red-zone TD rate62.4%
- 1.09Points / drive1.88
- 1.6%Turnover rate1.5%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 9–9 since 1999
NYG have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.9 points. ARI are 12-6 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYG–ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 38 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 12:12 | 3 | 13 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 10:52 | 9 | 66 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| NYG | Q1 6:11 | 5 | 19 | Punt | 0–7 |
| ARI | Q1 3:18 | 7 | 80 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q2 14:51 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 0–14 |
| ARI | Q2 13:45 | 9 | 39 | Field goal | 0–17 |
| NYG | Q2 8:43 | 10 | 39 | Turnover | 0–17 |
| ARI | Q2 4:20 | 6 | 18 | Field goal | 0–20 |
| NYG | Q2 1:09 | 5 | 14 | End of half | 0–20 |
| NYG | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–20 |
| ARI | Q3 13:43 | 9 | 65 | Touchdown | 7–28 |
| NYG | Q3 9:34 | 12 | 68 | Touchdown | 14–28 |
| ARI | Q3 3:27 | 8 | 41 | Punt | 14–28 |
| NYG | Q4 14:41 | 13 | 85 | Touchdown | 21–28 |
| ARI | Q4 8:51 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 21–28 |
| NYG | Q4 7:31 | 7 | 74 | Touchdown | 28–28 |
| ARI | Q4 4:25 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 28–28 |
| NYG | Q4 2:31 | 7 | 56 | Field goal | 31–28 |
| ARI | Q4 0:19 | 3 | 19 | End of half | 31–28 |
Box score
Individual performances
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 26/37 | 321 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 17 | 63 | 3.7 | 1 |
| Daniel Jones | 9 | 59 | 6.6 | 1 |
| Matt Breida | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalin Hyatt | 2 | 2 | 89 | 0 |
| Darren Waller | 6 | 8 | 76 | 0 |
| Darius Slayton | 3 | 6 | 62 | 0 |
| Isaiah Hodgins | 4 | 5 | 40 | 1 |
| Saquon Barkley | 6 | 7 | 29 | 1 |
| Parris Campbell | 4 | 6 | 21 | 0 |
| Sterling Shepard | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua Dobbs | 21/31 | 228 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Conner | 23 | 106 | 4.6 | 1 |
| Joshua Dobbs | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 1 |
| Keaontay Ingram | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Emari Demercado | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Ertz | 6 | 8 | 56 | 0 |
| Michael Wilson | 3 | 3 | 56 | 0 |
| Marquise Brown | 6 | 10 | 54 | 1 |
| Trey McBride | 2 | 3 | 32 | 0 |
| Rondale Moore | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 |
| Zach Pascal | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Emari Demercado | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| James Conner | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Giants.
Half-point at risk
1.86%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
48.6%
Expected total
45.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.36
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment-1.53
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-0.19



