Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2014 · Week 2

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Drew Stanton

25·14

Giants

New York

QB Eli Manning

MetLife Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 66°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

NYG -1

Total

41.5

Model margin

+3.3est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapGiants
  • -0.024EPA / play-0.014
  • 39.1%Success rate41.2%
  • +0.056EPA / dropback+0.072
  • -0.165EPA / rush-0.147
  • 8.2%Explosive rate7.7%
  • -4.59CPOE+0.79
  • 40.7%Third-down rate43.5%
  • 51.8%Red-zone TD rate63.1%
  • 1.54Points / drive1.78
  • 1.6%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ARI lead 9–8 since 1999

Meetings average 40.8 points. NYG are 5-12 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W2NYG @ ARI3128NYG
2020 · W14ARI @ NYG267ARI
2019 · W7ARI @ NYG2721ARI
2017 · W16NYG @ ARI023ARI
2011 · W4NYG @ ARI3127NYG
2009 · W7ARI @ NYG2417ARI
2008 · W12NYG @ ARI3729NYG
2005 · W1ARI @ NYG1942NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Drew Stanton14/2916700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Andre Ellington15916.10
Jonathan Dwyer9313.41
Robert Hughes122.00
John Brown122.00
Drew Stanton2-2-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Larry Fitzgerald610510
John Carlson23430
John Brown34280
Michael Floyd16190
Troy Niklas11160
Andre Ellington13100
Robert Hughes0100

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Eli Manning26/3927722

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rashad Jennings18643.60
Andre Williams8121.50
Eli Manning155.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +13.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.8%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.79
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.27