Closing spread
ARI -2.5
Total
44.5
Model margin
+5.6est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Cardinals
- OutDadrion Taylor-DemersonSBack· DNP
- QuestionableJosh SweatLBNot injury related - resting player· Limited
Giants
- DNPJohn Michael SchmitzCNot injury related - personal matter
- LimitedAndrew ThomasTGroin
Win probability
- Giants
- Cardinals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.024EPA / play+0.027
- 44.6%Success rate42.9%
- +0.021EPA / dropback+0.118
- -0.105EPA / rush-0.102
- 4.4%Explosive rate7.8%
- +0.50CPOE-2.00
- 38.2%Third-down rate44.9%
- 50.1%Red-zone TD rate62.4%
- 1.84Points / drive2.15
- 1.2%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 9–9 since 1999
NYG have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.9 points. NYG are 6-12 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ARI–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 58 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 11:08 | 9 | 56 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| ARI | Q1 6:36 | 6 | 74 | Touchdown | 14–3 |
| NYG | Q1 3:05 | 5 | 13 | Field goal | 14–6 |
| ARI | Q2 14:55 | 2 | -3 | Turnover | 14–6 |
| NYG | Q2 13:56 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 14–6 |
| ARI | Q2 13:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–6 |
| NYG | Q2 11:23 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 14–6 |
| ARI | Q2 9:59 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 14–6 |
| NYG | Q2 8:27 | 8 | 41 | Touchdown | 14–12 |
| ARI | Q2 4:30 | 3 | 8 | Turnover | 14–12 |
| NYG | Q2 3:09 | 2 | 26 | Touchdown | 14–19 |
| ARI | Q2 2:24 | 3 | -16 | Punt | 14–19 |
| NYG | Q2 1:03 | 4 | 14 | Turnover | 14–19 |
| ARI | Q2 0:24 | 3 | 33 | Field goal | 17–19 |
| NYG | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 7 | Turnover | 17–19 |
| ARI | Q3 12:29 | 11 | 35 | Touchdown | 24–19 |
| NYG | Q3 7:20 | 9 | 76 | Touchdown | 24–27 |
| ARI | Q3 1:44 | 5 | 19 | Punt | 24–27 |
| NYG | Q4 13:55 | 5 | 42 | Turnover | 24–27 |
| ARI | Q4 11:08 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 24–27 |
| NYG | Q4 9:20 | 6 | 16 | Punt | 24–27 |
| ARI | Q4 6:00 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 24–27 |
| NYG | Q4 4:47 | 6 | 16 | Field goal | 24–30 |
| ARI | Q4 2:11 | 13 | 45 | Opp touchdown | 24–36 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacoby Brissett | 21/35 | 166 | 2 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremiyah Love | 14 | 63 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 8 | 42 | 5.3 | 1 |
| Jacoby Brissett | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Wilson | 7 | 13 | 95 | 0 |
| Trey McBride | 7 | 12 | 31 | 0 |
| Elijah Higgins | 2 | 2 | 19 | 1 |
| Marvin Harrison Jr. | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 |
| Hunter Long | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Jeremiyah Love | 1 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jameis Winston | 18/29 | 250 | 3 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Skattebo | 18 | 58 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Najee Harris | 9 | 30 | 3.3 | 0 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malik Nabers | 6 | 7 | 112 | 1 |
| Isaiah Likely | 7 | 12 | 66 | 0 |
| Malachi Fields | 2 | 3 | 52 | 1 |
| Theo Johnson | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
| Cam Skattebo | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Patrick Ricard | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Braxton Berrios | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Cardinals.
Half-point at risk
1.85%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
64.0%
Expected total
45.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.41
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.63



