Closing spread
PIT -11
Total
36
Model margin
+2.3est.
PIT perspective
Push chance
1.4%est.
Win probability
- Steelers
- Bengals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.068EPA / play-0.063
- 39.4%Success rate41.6%
- -0.034EPA / dropback-0.073
- -0.132EPA / rush-0.048
- 7.1%Explosive rate6.4%
- 39.2%Third-down rate37.4%
- 43.1%Red-zone TD rate52.5%
- 1.24Points / drive1.27
- 2.4%Turnover rate2.2%
- +0.041EPA / play allowed-0.045
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 41–16 since 1999
PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. PIT are 38-18-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CIN–PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 84 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| PIT | Q1 13:33 | 5 | 15 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 10:35 | 6 | 65 | Touchdown | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q1 8:04 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q1 6:19 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q1 4:45 | 8 | 37 | Field goal | 14–3 |
| CIN | Q1 1:21 | 6 | 21 | Turnover | 14–3 |
| PIT | Q2 14:17 | 2 | 1 | Opp touchdown | 21–3 |
| CIN | Q2 13:30 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 21–3 |
| PIT | Q2 13:30 | 3 | 11 | Turnover | 21–3 |
| CIN | Q2 12:08 | 5 | 25 | Field goal | 24–3 |
| PIT | Q2 10:33 | 11 | 45 | Field goal | 24–6 |
| CIN | Q2 5:43 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 24–6 |
| PIT | Q2 3:15 | 6 | 71 | Touchdown | 24–13 |
| CIN | Q2 1:53 | 4 | 24 | Punt | 24–13 |
| PIT | Q2 0:39 | 3 | 12 | Punt | 24–13 |
| CIN | Q2 0:02 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 24–13 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 65 | Touchdown | 24–20 |
| CIN | Q3 13:32 | 8 | 61 | Field goal | 27–20 |
| PIT | Q3 9:44 | 7 | 39 | Punt | 27–20 |
| CIN | Q3 6:10 | 7 | 50 | Punt | 27–20 |
| PIT | Q3 3:22 | 6 | 21 | Turnover on downs | 27–20 |
| CIN | Q3 0:11 | 5 | 26 | Turnover on downs | 27–20 |
| PIT | Q4 12:37 | 6 | 21 | Turnover on downs | 27–20 |
| CIN | Q4 9:52 | 9 | 48 | Missed field goal | 27–20 |
| PIT | Q4 5:51 | 3 | -16 | Punt | 27–20 |
| CIN | Q4 4:42 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 27–20 |
| PIT | Q4 4:12 | 12 | 66 | Turnover on downs | 27–20 |
| CIN | Q4 0:49 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 27–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Blake | 15/28 | 241 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Dillon | 23 | 120 | 5.2 | 0 |
| Michael Basnight | 1 | 35 | 35.0 | 0 |
| Jeff Blake | 11 | 25 | 2.3 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnay Scott | 4 | 6 | 123 | 1 |
| Carl Pickens | 2 | 8 | 41 | 0 |
| Nicolas Luchey | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Michael Basnight | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 |
| Corey Dillon | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Willie Jackson | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Marco Battaglia | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony McGee | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Tomczak | 19/35 | 264 | 2 | 0 |
| Kordell Stewart | 5/11 | 36 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Bettis | 22 | 81 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Richard Huntley | 5 | 12 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Mike Tomczak | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Amos Zereoue | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hines Ward | 7 | 11 | 89 | 1 |
| Troy Edwards | 7 | 12 | 86 | 0 |
| Mark Bruener | 2 | 3 | 51 | 0 |
| Bobby Shaw | 3 | 7 | 36 | 1 |
| Will Blackwell | 2 | 5 | 19 | 0 |
| Mitch Lyons | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Jerome Bettis | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Richard Huntley | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Courtney Hawkins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Bengals.
Half-point at risk
1.41%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
55.2%
Expected total
45.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.30
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.27



