1999 · Week 14 · Division

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Tony Banks

31·24

Steelers

Pittsburgh

QB Mike Tomczak

Three Rivers Stadium · outdoors · astroturf · 44°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

PIT -1.5

Total

36

Model margin

+3.5est.

PIT perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Steelers
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Steelers winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapSteelers
  • -0.091EPA / play-0.063
  • 36.5%Success rate41.6%
  • -0.084EPA / dropback-0.073
  • -0.100EPA / rush-0.048
  • 7.5%Explosive rate6.4%
  • 28.4%Third-down rate37.4%
  • 40.6%Red-zone TD rate52.5%
  • 1.00Points / drive1.27
  • 2.7%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.151EPA / play allowed-0.045

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

PIT lead 33–26 since 1999

PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 39.4 points. PIT are 30-26-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18BAL @ PIT2426PIT
2025 · W14PIT @ BAL2722PIT
2024 · playoffsPIT @ BAL1428BAL
2024 · W16PIT @ BAL1734BAL
2024 · W11BAL @ PIT1618PIT
2023 · W18PIT @ BAL1710PIT
2023 · W5BAL @ PIT1017PIT
2022 · W17PIT @ BAL1613PIT

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks8/2626830

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Priest Holmes181307.21
Chuck Evans122.00
Tony Banks600.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Qadry Ismail6112583
Billy Davis1370
Chuck Evans1130
Justin Armour0700
Ryan Collins0100
Greg DeLong0100
Marcus Nash0200

Steelers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mike Tomczak22/4124920
Jerome Bettis1/12110
Kordell Stewart1/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Richard Huntley8688.50
Jerome Bettis13393.00
Mike Tomczak122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +1.53.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.12%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.5%

Expected total

44.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.66
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.40
  • Rest differential+0.24
  • Expected margin+3.54