1999 · Week 14 · Division

Final

Chargers

San Diego

QB Jim Harbaugh

19·16

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Jon Kitna

Seattle Kingdome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

SEA -9.5

Total

42.5

Model margin

+1.9est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–5 since 1999

SEA have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.6 points. SEA are 6-5-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W4LAC @ SEA23–30SEA
2022 · W7SEA @ LAC37–23SEA
2018 · W9LAC @ SEA25–17CHARGERS
2014 · W2SEA @ SD21–30CHARGERS
2010 · W3SD @ SEA20–27SEA
2006 · W16SD @ SEA20–17CHARGERS
2002 · W17SEA @ SD31–28SEA
2001 · W16SEA @ SD25–22SEA

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSD–SEA
LACQ1 15:001072Touchdown7–0
SEAQ1 11:02721Turnover7–0
LACQ1 9:1734Punt7–0
SEAQ1 8:27450Field goal7–3
LACQ1 6:311239Field goal10–3
SEAQ1 1:41854Field goal10–6
LACQ2 13:1838Punt10–6
SEAQ2 11:333-4Punt10–6
LACQ2 10:341160Field goal13–6
SEAQ2 6:211055Field goal13–9
LACQ2 0:2414End of half13–9
SEAQ3 15:00767Touchdown13–16
LACQ3 11:20846Punt13–16
SEAQ3 7:20822Punt13–16
LACQ3 3:36823Punt13–16
SEAQ3 0:443-7Punt13–16
LACQ3 0:07951Field goal16–16
SEAQ4 12:04420Missed field goal16–16
LACQ4 9:5210Turnover16–16
SEAQ4 9:4130Missed field goal16–16
LACQ4 8:4157Punt16–16
SEAQ4 6:0725Turnover16–16
LACQ4 5:2433Field goal19–16
SEAQ4 3:19864Missed field goal19–16
LACQ4 1:10612Turnover on downs19–16

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna25/4028511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Watters20753.80
Jon Kitna111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +9.57.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%2.9%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

2.94%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.2%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.67
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.89

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.