2002 · Week 17

Final / OT

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

31·28

Chargers

San Diego

QB Drew Brees

Qualcomm Stadium · outdoors · grass · 61°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

SD -3

Total

42.5

Model margin

+2.5est.

SD perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–5 since 1999

SEA have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.6 points. SD are 5-6-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W4LAC @ SEA23–30SEA
2022 · W7SEA @ LAC37–23SEA
2018 · W9LAC @ SEA25–17CHARGERS
2014 · W2SEA @ SD21–30CHARGERS
2010 · W3SD @ SEA20–27SEA
2006 · W16SD @ SEA20–17CHARGERS
2001 · W16SEA @ SD25–22SEA
2001 · W12SD @ SEA10–13SEA

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSEA–SD
SEAQ1 15:00879Touchdown7–0
LACQ1 10:4938Punt7–0
SEAQ1 9:33645Turnover7–0
LACQ1 7:05616Punt7–0
SEAQ1 4:4038Punt7–0
LACQ1 3:5935Punt7–0
SEAQ1 2:3739Punt7–0
LACQ1 0:41979Touchdown7–7
SEAQ2 11:5938Punt7–7
LACQ2 10:48636Field goal7–10
SEAQ2 8:21534Missed field goal7–10
LACQ2 6:3733Punt7–10
SEAQ2 5:37678Turnover7–10
LACQ2 1:51837Turnover7–10
LACQ3 15:00657Field goal7–13
SEAQ3 12:061242Punt7–13
LACQ3 5:28980Touchdown7–20
SEAQ3 0:59562Touchdown14–20
LACQ4 13:591365Touchdown14–28
SEAQ4 8:37558Touchdown21–28
LACQ4 6:14737Punt21–28
SEAQ4 3:321882Touchdown28–28
LACQ4 0:0100End of half28–28
SEAOT940Turnover28–28
LACOT3-9Punt28–28
SEAOT946Field goal31–28

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck36/5344922

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander15674.51
Matt Hasselbeck7426.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%2.6%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.7%

Expected total

45.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.09
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.47

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.