Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

1999 · Week 16 · Division

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jeff Blake

0·22

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Tony Banks

PSINet Stadium · outdoors · grass · 35°F · wind 18mph

Closing spread

BAL -7

Total

45.5

Model margin

+4.4est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

4.9%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapRavens
  • -0.068EPA / play-0.091
  • 39.4%Success rate36.5%
  • -0.034EPA / dropback-0.084
  • -0.132EPA / rush-0.100
  • 7.1%Explosive rate7.5%
  • 39.2%Third-down rate28.4%
  • 43.1%Red-zone TD rate40.6%
  • 1.24Points / drive1.00
  • 2.4%Turnover rate2.7%
  • +0.041EPA / play allowed-0.151

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. BAL are 25-28-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake20/3718702

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Basnight10414.10
Corey Dillon10272.70
Jeff Blake4225.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Darnay Scott510830
Carl Pickens48380
Corey Dillon57300
Tony McGee11180
Willie Jackson1350
Michael Basnight2240
Craig Yeast0100

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks15/3318711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Priest Holmes13594.50
Errict Rhett12504.20
Pat Johnson11212.00
Chuck Evans341.30
Jermaine Lewis144.00
Tony Banks210.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

4.90%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.7%

Expected total

44.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.37
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+4.37