1999 · Week 17

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

24·49

Packers

Green Bay

QB Brett Favre

Lambeau Field · outdoors · grass · 32°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

GB -7.5

Total

38

Model margin

+5.6est.

GB perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Packers
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Packers winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapPackers
  • -0.176EPA / play-0.016
  • 35.9%Success rate40.8%
  • -0.148EPA / dropback+0.060
  • -0.226EPA / rush-0.154
  • 5.9%Explosive rate8.8%
  • 33.3%Third-down rate36.6%
  • 53.1%Red-zone TD rate54.0%
  • 0.87Points / drive1.48
  • 3.8%Turnover rate3.3%
  • -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.019

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

GB lead 8–5 since 1999

GB have won 3 straight. Meetings average 49.1 points. GB are 8-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W7GB @ ARI2723GB
2024 · W6ARI @ GB1334GB
2021 · W8GB @ ARI2421GB
2018 · W13ARI @ GB2017ARI
2015 · playoffsGB @ ARI2026ARI
2015 · W16GB @ ARI838ARI
2012 · W9ARI @ GB1731GB
2009 · playoffsGB @ ARI4551ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer35/5739623

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mario Bates17643.81
Adrian Murrell5132.60
Jake Plummer231.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Rob Moore691200
Frank Sanders13201181
David Boston49520
Adrian Murrell57370
Mario Bates33350
Terry Hardy25180
Mac Cody1191
Johnny McWilliams1270

Packers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre21/3431121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Dorsey Levens241466.14
Brett Favre12020.00
Basil Mitchell2105.00
Matt Hasselbeck100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +7.53.4%6.3%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Packers; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.22%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

64.0%

Expected total

44.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.06
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.63