Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

1999 · Week 17

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Tony Banks

3·20

Patriots

New England

QB Drew Bledsoe

Foxboro Stadium · outdoors · grass · 47°F · wind 15mph

Closing spread

BAL -1

Total

37.5

Model margin

+0.4est.

NE perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Patriots
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Patriots winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapPatriots
  • -0.091EPA / play-0.107
  • 36.5%Success rate37.4%
  • -0.084EPA / dropback-0.062
  • -0.100EPA / rush-0.179
  • 7.5%Explosive rate7.8%
  • 28.4%Third-down rate35.1%
  • 40.6%Red-zone TD rate45.4%
  • 1.00Points / drive1.19
  • 2.7%Turnover rate3.1%
  • -0.151EPA / play allowed-0.083

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NE lead 11–5 since 1999

Meetings average 47.7 points. NE are 8-7-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16NE @ BAL2824NE
2022 · W3BAL @ NE3726BAL
2020 · W10BAL @ NE1723NE
2019 · W9NE @ BAL2037BAL
2016 · W14BAL @ NE2330NE
2014 · playoffsBAL @ NE3135NE
2013 · W16NE @ BAL417NE
2012 · playoffsBAL @ NE2813BAL

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks18/2616301
Stoney Case8/148801

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Priest Holmes16955.90
Chuck Evans2126.00
Tony Banks273.50
Stoney Case155.00
Errict Rhett200.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Pat Johnson9111140
Qadry Ismail59500
Priest Holmes68430
Justin Armour25220
Chuck Evans44220
Billy Davis0100
A.J. Ofodile0200

Patriots

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Drew Bledsoe15/2510811
Troy Brown0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Terry Allen13262.00
Lamont Warren166.00
Drew Bledsoe300.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -12.6%4.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Patriots; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

50.1%

Expected total

41.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.17
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.39