Closing spread
BAL -3
Total
33
Model margin
+1.1est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
7.2%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Giants
- Ravens
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.056EPA / play+0.016
- 40.2%Success rate40.1%
- -0.061EPA / dropback+0.137
- -0.052EPA / rush-0.130
- 8.4%Explosive rate8.7%
- 40.7%Third-down rate39.9%
- 36.0%Red-zone TD rate67.6%
- 1.45Points / drive1.73
- 2.3%Turnover rate2.1%
- -0.217EPA / play allowed-0.065
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BAL lead 5–3 since 1999
Meetings average 45.3 points. NYG are 3-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BAL–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 13:43 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 13:02 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 11:02 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 9:55 | 5 | 18 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 7:35 | 2 | 41 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 6:50 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q1 4:21 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 2:41 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q1 1:25 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 0:18 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q2 14:41 | 6 | 6 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q2 11:22 | 4 | 0 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q2 10:36 | 5 | 7 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q2 8:24 | 9 | 45 | Punt | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q2 4:09 | 6 | 59 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| NYG | Q2 1:41 | 3 | 43 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| BAL | Q2 0:54 | 2 | 21 | End of half | 10–0 |
| BAL | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 6 | Punt | 10–0 |
| NYG | Q3 11:37 | 5 | 6 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| BAL | Q3 8:57 | 5 | 17 | Missed field goal | 10–0 |
| NYG | Q3 6:03 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 10–0 |
| BAL | Q3 4:29 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 16–0 |
| NYG | Q3 3:58 | 1 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 17–0 |
| BAL | Q3 3:49 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 17–6 |
| NYG | Q3 3:49 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 23–7 |
| BAL | Q3 3:31 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 24–7 |
| NYG | Q3 3:13 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 24–7 |
| BAL | Q3 2:19 | 5 | 20 | Punt | 24–7 |
| NYG | Q4 14:13 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 24–7 |
| BAL | Q4 13:02 | 6 | 33 | Touchdown | 31–7 |
| NYG | Q4 8:45 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 31–7 |
| BAL | Q4 8:29 | 4 | 19 | Field goal | 34–7 |
| NYG | Q4 5:27 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 34–7 |
| BAL | Q4 4:10 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 34–7 |
| NYG | Q4 1:48 | 7 | 22 | End of half | 34–7 |
Box score
Individual performances
Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trent Dilfer | 12/25 | 153 | 1 | 0 |
| Tony Banks | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamal Lewis | 27 | 102 | 3.8 | 1 |
| Priest Holmes | 4 | 8 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jermaine Lewis | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Trent Dilfer | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Stokley | 3 | 6 | 52 | 1 |
| Qadry Ismail | 1 | 3 | 44 | 0 |
| Ben Coates | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 |
| Pat Johnson | 1 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
| Jermaine Lewis | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Shannon Sharpe | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Priest Holmes | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Jamal Lewis | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Collins | 15/39 | 112 | 0 | 4 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 11 | 49 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Kerry Collins | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Joe Montgomery | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ike Hilliard | 3 | 11 | 30 | 0 |
| Tiki Barber | 6 | 10 | 26 | 0 |
| Amani Toomer | 2 | 5 | 24 | 0 |
| Ron Dixon | 1 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Howard Cross | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Pete Mitchell | 1 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Greg Comella | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Joe Jurevicius | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Ravens.
Half-point at risk
7.21%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
52.1%
Expected total
41.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.44
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.12



