2001 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

10·17

Bears

Chicago

QB Shane Matthews

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 63°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

MIN -3

Total

43.5

Model margin

+5.3est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

6.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • -0.050EPA / play-0.063
  • 42.2%Success rate39.4%
  • -0.012EPA / dropback-0.033
  • -0.133EPA / rush-0.099
  • 7.6%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 42.5%Third-down rate33.3%
  • 49.2%Red-zone TD rate52.2%
  • 1.40Points / drive1.28
  • 3.7%Turnover rate2.1%
  • +0.044EPA / play allowed-0.146

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper24/3623310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett16563.50
Daunte Culpepper8425.30
Jimmy Kleinsasser166.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jim Miller18/2920421
Shane Matthews5/93300

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Allen15453.00
Marty Booker144.00
Shane Matthews100.00
Jim Miller2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -33.4%6.3%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

6.34%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

63.2%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.88
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.10
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.34