2001 · Week 3 · Division

Final

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Brad Johnson

16·20

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

TB -2.5

Total

39

Model margin

-0.8est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Buccaneers

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBuccaneers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Buccaneersedge mapVikings
  • -0.025EPA / play-0.050
  • 39.6%Success rate42.2%
  • +0.010EPA / dropback-0.012
  • -0.085EPA / rush-0.133
  • 6.6%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 35.3%Third-down rate42.5%
  • 42.8%Red-zone TD rate49.2%
  • 1.43Points / drive1.40
  • 1.8%Turnover rate3.7%
  • -0.085EPA / play allowed+0.044

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TB lead 10–5 since 1999

TB have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.1 points. MIN are 4-10-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W1TB @ MIN2017TB
2020 · W14MIN @ TB1426TB
2017 · W3TB @ MIN1734MIN
2014 · W8MIN @ TB1913MIN
2012 · W8TB @ MIN3617TB
2011 · W2TB @ MIN2420TB
2008 · W11MIN @ TB1319TB
2005 · W1TB @ MIN2413TB

Box score

Individual performances

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson20/3422401

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Warrick Dunn11655.91
Brad Johnson2199.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Keyshawn Johnson713960
Jacquez Green35540
Warrick Dunn56340
Aaron Stecker33330
Dave Moore0100
Karl Williams0100

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper30/4432212

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett13513.90
Daunte Culpepper5204.01
Randy Moss199.00
Doug Chapman362.00
Jimmy Kleinsasser111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.52.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Buccaneers.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.0%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.23
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-1.12
  • Expected margin-0.78