2001 · Week 4

Final

Chargers

San Diego

QB Doug Flutie

16·20

Browns

Cleveland

QB Tim Couch

Cleveland Browns Stadium · outdoors · grass · 45°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

SD -3

Total

35

Model margin

+0.8est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

7.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SD lead 11–3 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 5 straight. Meetings average 44.1 points. CLE are 7-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W9LAC @ CLE27–10CHARGERS
2022 · W5LAC @ CLE30–28CHARGERS
2021 · W5CLE @ LAC42–47CHARGERS
2018 · W6LAC @ CLE38–14CHARGERS
2017 · W13CLE @ LAC10–19CHARGERS
2016 · W16SD @ CLE17–20CLE
2015 · W4CLE @ SD27–30CHARGERS
2012 · W8SD @ CLE6–7CLE

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSD–CLE
CLEQ1 15:003-5Punt0–0
LACQ1 12:3939Punt0–0
CLEQ1 11:0635Punt0–0
LACQ1 9:31951Field goal3–0
CLEQ1 3:16960Field goal3–3
LACQ2 14:30520Punt3–3
CLEQ2 12:0133Punt3–3
LACQ2 10:3138Punt3–3
CLEQ2 8:331586Touchdown3–10
LACQ2 0:332-6End of half3–10
LACQ3 15:00373Touchdown10–10
CLEQ3 13:5334Punt10–10
LACQ3 11:59518Punt10–10
CLEQ3 10:0239Punt10–10
LACQ3 7:5236Punt10–10
CLEQ3 6:54414Punt10–10
LACQ3 5:343-3Punt10–10
CLEQ3 3:3231Missed field goal10–10
LACQ3 2:341554Field goal13–10
CLEQ4 10:231-3Turnover13–10
LACQ4 10:0335Field goal16–10
CLEQ4 8:32754Field goal16–13
LACQ4 4:583-4Punt16–13
CLEQ4 3:52850Touchdown16–20
LACQ4 1:15838End of half16–20

Box score

Individual performances

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tim Couch14/2720310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Jackson26682.61
Tim Couch22412.00
Quincy Morgan144.00
Jamel White210.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -34.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

7.26%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.1%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.81
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.76

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.