2024 · Week 9

Final

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

27·10

Browns

Cleveland

QB Jameis Winston

FirstEnergy Stadium · outdoors · grass · 57°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

LAC -2

Total

42.5

Model margin

-2.8est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Chargersedge mapBrowns
  • +0.044EPA / play-0.179
  • 42.3%Success rate37.1%
  • +0.127EPA / dropback-0.196
  • -0.079EPA / rush-0.140
  • 9.2%Explosive rate5.8%
  • +1.69CPOE-4.22
  • 40.1%Third-down rate28.8%
  • 59.6%Red-zone TD rate56.8%
  • 2.25Points / drive1.09
  • 0.8%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 11–3 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 5 straight. Meetings average 44.1 points. CLE are 7-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W5LAC @ CLE3028CHARGERS
2021 · W5CLE @ LAC4247CHARGERS
2018 · W6LAC @ CLE3814CHARGERS
2017 · W13CLE @ LAC1019CHARGERS
2016 · W16SD @ CLE1720CLE
2015 · W4CLE @ SD2730CHARGERS
2012 · W8SD @ CLE67CLE
2009 · W13SD @ CLE3023CHARGERS

Box score

Individual performances

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert18/2728220

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
J.K. Dobbins14856.12
Kimani Vidal571.40
Justin Herbert320.70
Quentin Johnston122.00

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jameis Winston26/4623513

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Nick Chubb15392.60
Jameis Winston5275.40
Pierre Strong284.00
Jerome Ford252.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Cedric Tillman611751
Jerry Jeudy711730
Jordan Akins34320
David Njoku57290
Elijah Moore39280
Jerome Ford1320
Nick Chubb11-40

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -22.7%3.0%4.8%3.1%7.5%6.9%2.6%3.9%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

41.6%

Expected total

42.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.50
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-2.79