2001 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

7·26

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Elvis Grbac

PSINet Stadium · outdoors · grass · 55°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

BAL -3.5

Total

33.5

Model margin

+3.2est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapRavens
  • -0.011EPA / play-0.088
  • 39.7%Success rate39.6%
  • +0.112EPA / dropback-0.029
  • -0.193EPA / rush-0.166
  • 8.0%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 42.1%Third-down rate36.2%
  • 56.2%Red-zone TD rate45.6%
  • 1.49Points / drive1.28
  • 2.4%Turnover rate3.0%
  • +0.045EPA / play allowed-0.148

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–9 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 35 points. BAL are 12-8-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6BAL @ TEN2416BAL
2020 · playoffsBAL @ TEN2013BAL
2020 · W11TEN @ BAL3024TEN
2019 · playoffsTEN @ BAL2812TEN
2018 · W6BAL @ TEN210BAL
2017 · W9BAL @ TEN2023TEN
2014 · W10TEN @ BAL721BAL
2011 · W2BAL @ TEN1326TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair17/3215401
Mike Green0/1001

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George13262.00
Steve McNair3124.00
Mike Green199.00

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Elvis Grbac15/3125910

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Terry Allen221084.91
Jason Brookins15684.51
Obafemi Ayanbadejo2178.50
Travis Taylor11414.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Qadry Ismail35931
Travis Taylor510800
Shannon Sharpe36570
Terry Allen22120
Moe Williams12100
Pat Johnson0100
Brandon Stokley0200

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.5%

Expected total

42.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.16
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+3.16