2019 · DIV

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Ryan Tannehill

28·12

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Lamar Jackson

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · grass · 69°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

BAL -10

Total

47.5

Model margin

+4.7est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Titans

Ravens

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapRavens
  • +0.063EPA / play+0.203
  • 45.7%Success rate48.1%
  • +0.143EPA / dropback+0.322
  • -0.046EPA / rush+0.088
  • 11.6%Explosive rate12.0%
  • +3.45CPOE+3.13
  • 39.4%Third-down rate48.0%
  • 74.8%Red-zone TD rate68.9%
  • 1.99Points / drive2.90
  • 1.6%Turnover rate1.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 13–9 since 1999

BAL have won 3 straight. Meetings average 35.3 points. BAL are 12-9-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W4TEN @ BAL18–24BAL
2023 · W6BAL @ TEN24–16BAL
2020 · playoffsBAL @ TEN20–13BAL
2020 · W11TEN @ BAL30–24TEN
2018 · W6BAL @ TEN21–0BAL
2017 · W9BAL @ TEN20–23TEN
2014 · W10TEN @ BAL7–21BAL
2011 · W2BAL @ TEN13–26TEN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultTEN–BAL
TENQ1 15:00520Punt0–0
BALQ1 11:42744Turnover0–0
TENQ1 7:49829Touchdown7–0
BALQ1 3:36620Turnover on downs13–0
TENQ2 14:53145Touchdown14–0
BALQ2 14:4532Punt14–0
TENQ2 13:3359Punt14–0
BALQ2 11:131159Field goal14–3
TENQ2 5:52536Punt14–3
BALQ2 2:321391Field goal14–6
BALQ3 15:001368Turnover on downs14–6
TENQ3 9:55681Touchdown21–6
BALQ3 6:541-5Turnover21–6
TENQ3 6:44620Touchdown28–6
BALQ3 4:16939Turnover28–6
TENQ3 1:45429Punt28–6
BALQ4 14:491083Touchdown28–12
TENQ4 11:04828Punt28–12
BALQ4 6:251069Turnover on downs28–12
TENQ4 4:2735Punt28–12
BALQ4 2:45960Turnover on downs28–12
TENQ4 0:4900End of half28–12

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Tannehill7/148820
Derrick Henry1/1310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Derrick Henry301956.50
Ryan Tannehill6132.21
A.J. Brown199.00

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Lamar Jackson31/5936512

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Jackson201437.20
Mark Ingram6223.70
Gus Edwards3206.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +106.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

3.23%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.6%

Expected total

45.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.50
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.48
  • Expected margin+4.72