2020 · WC

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Lamar Jackson

20·13

Titans

Tennessee

QB Ryan Tannehill

Nissan Stadium · outdoors · grass · 33°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

BAL -3.5

Total

53

Model margin

-0.7est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapTitans
  • +0.109EPA / play+0.189
  • 45.2%Success rate50.8%
  • +0.125EPA / dropback+0.297
  • +0.093EPA / rush+0.070
  • 10.3%Explosive rate10.3%
  • -0.32CPOE+2.16
  • 49.8%Third-down rate47.4%
  • 71.9%Red-zone TD rate76.8%
  • 2.64Points / drive2.85
  • 1.8%Turnover rate1.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–9 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 35 points. TEN are 8-12-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6BAL @ TEN2416BAL
2020 · W11TEN @ BAL3024TEN
2019 · playoffsTEN @ BAL2812TEN
2018 · W6BAL @ TEN210BAL
2017 · W9BAL @ TEN2023TEN
2014 · W10TEN @ BAL721BAL
2011 · W2BAL @ TEN1326TEN
2008 · playoffsBAL @ TEN1310BAL

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Lamar Jackson17/2417901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Jackson161368.51
J.K. Dobbins9434.81
Gus Edwards8384.80
Marquise Brown2199.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Marquise Brown791090
Mark Andrews46410
Patrick Ricard34260
Willie Snead2290
Dez Bryant0100
Miles Boykin0100
J.K. Dobbins11-60

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Tannehill18/2616511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Derrick Henry18402.20
Ryan Tannehill263.00
Jeremy McNichols144.00
Darrynton Evans111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.52.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

7.42%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.1%

Expected total

47.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.42
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.71