2001 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Tony Banks

9·23

Giants

New York

QB Kerry Collins

Giants Stadium · outdoors · grass · 55°F · wind 16mph

Closing spread

NYG -14

Total

36

Model margin

+1.7est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

2.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapGiants
  • -0.103EPA / play-0.048
  • 38.9%Success rate40.3%
  • -0.101EPA / dropback-0.007
  • -0.105EPA / rush-0.113
  • 8.6%Explosive rate9.8%
  • 34.9%Third-down rate35.2%
  • 43.9%Red-zone TD rate60.6%
  • 1.18Points / drive1.21
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.4%
  • -0.069EPA / play allowed-0.053

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999

WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. NYG are 28-24-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15WAS @ NYG2921WAS
2025 · W1NYG @ WAS621WAS
2024 · W9WAS @ NYG2722WAS
2024 · W2NYG @ WAS1821WAS
2023 · W11NYG @ WAS3119NYG
2023 · W7WAS @ NYG714NYG
2022 · W15NYG @ WAS2012NYG
2022 · W13WAS @ NYG2020Tie

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks13/3115102

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis12393.30
Michael Westbrook188.00
Tony Banks200.00

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kerry Collins15/2917712

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Damon Washington25903.60
Ron Dayne16392.40
Amani Toomer199.00
Greg Comella263.00
Kerry Collins2-2-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Amani Toomer714970
Greg Comella35300
Ike Hilliard24210
Damon Washington11160
Joe Jurevicius13120
Dan Campbell1111
Howard Cross0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +147.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.6%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.89
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.68