2001 · Week 8
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 6mph
Closing spread
SEA -2.5
Total
37
Model margin
+3.4est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Commanders
- Seahawks
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.018EPA / play-0.103
- 38.9%Success rate38.9%
- +0.031EPA / dropback-0.101
- -0.080EPA / rush-0.105
- 8.3%Explosive rate8.6%
- 36.1%Third-down rate34.9%
- 55.9%Red-zone TD rate43.9%
- 1.20Points / drive1.18
- 1.9%Turnover rate2.3%
- +0.002EPA / play allowed-0.069
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
WAS lead 9–7 since 1999
Meetings average 40.6 points. WAS are 10-5-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SEA–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 71 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| SEA | Q1 10:26 | 6 | 80 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q1 7:02 | 4 | 18 | Punt | 7–7 |
| SEA | Q1 4:20 | 2 | 1 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q1 3:58 | 4 | 15 | Field goal | 7–10 |
| SEA | Q1 1:52 | 2 | 0 | Turnover | 7–10 |
| WAS | Q1 1:32 | 4 | 23 | Field goal | 7–13 |
| SEA | Q2 14:51 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–13 |
| WAS | Q2 13:19 | 13 | 69 | Touchdown | 7–20 |
| SEA | Q2 5:29 | 11 | 80 | Turnover | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q2 0:54 | 2 | 20 | End of half | 7–20 |
| SEA | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q3 13:29 | 11 | 74 | Touchdown | 7–27 |
| SEA | Q3 7:56 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 7–27 |
| WAS | Q3 4:36 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 7–27 |
| SEA | Q3 2:46 | 2 | 38 | Touchdown | 14–27 |
| WAS | Q3 2:09 | 4 | 21 | Punt | 14–27 |
| SEA | Q4 14:17 | 8 | 29 | Turnover on downs | 14–27 |
| WAS | Q4 10:53 | 7 | 33 | Turnover | 14–27 |
| SEA | Q4 6:24 | 4 | 14 | Punt | 14–27 |
| WAS | Q4 5:14 | 7 | 13 | Punt | 14–27 |
| SEA | Q4 2:30 | 2 | 9 | Turnover | 14–27 |
| WAS | Q4 2:03 | 4 | 12 | End of half | 14–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Seahawks
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Hasselbeck | 6/12 | 127 | 0 | 2 |
| Trent Dilfer | 8/18 | 121 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shaun Alexander | 13 | 60 | 4.6 | 1 |
| Matt Hasselbeck | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Williams | 2 | 3 | 69 | 0 |
| Bobby Engram | 2 | 3 | 53 | 0 |
| Darrell Jackson | 1 | 8 | 46 | 1 |
| Shaun Alexander | 4 | 5 | 42 | 0 |
| Christian Fauria | 2 | 3 | 25 | 0 |
| Alex Bannister | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
| Itula Mili | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Koren Robinson | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Trent Dilfer | 1 | 1 | -5 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Banks | 15/23 | 152 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Davis | 32 | 142 | 4.4 | 1 |
| Ki-Jana Carter | 10 | 57 | 5.7 | 0 |
| Tony Banks | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Davis | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 |
| Walter Rasby | 2 | 2 | 22 | 1 |
| Michael Westbrook | 2 | 3 | 18 | 1 |
| Rod Gardner | 1 | 5 | 18 | 0 |
| Kevin Lockett | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Ki-Jana Carter | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Zeron Flemister | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Derrius Thompson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Seahawks.
Half-point at risk
1.99%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
58.2%
Expected total
44.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.86
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+3.42



