2001 · Week 11

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

20·17

Chargers

San Diego

QB Doug Flutie

Qualcomm Stadium · outdoors · grass · 63°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

SD -7

Total

44

Model margin

+2.5est.

SD perspective

Push chance

4.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SD lead 5–4 since 1999

ARI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.7 points. SD are 4-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1ARI @ LAC26–14ARI
2024 · W7LAC @ ARI15–17ARI
2022 · W12LAC @ ARI25–24CHARGERS
2018 · W12ARI @ LAC10–45CHARGERS
2014 · W1SD @ ARI17–18ARI
2010 · W4ARI @ SD10–41CHARGERS
2006 · W17ARI @ SD20–27CHARGERS
2002 · W3SD @ ARI23–15CHARGERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultARI–SD
LACQ1 15:00626Punt0–0
ARIQ1 11:4137Punt0–0
LACQ1 10:251048Missed field goal0–0
ARIQ1 4:2530Turnover0–0
LACQ1 3:31313Field goal0–3
ARIQ1 1:27719Punt0–3
LACQ2 13:361466Missed field goal0–3
ARIQ2 5:38781Touchdown7–3
LACQ2 2:0430Punt7–3
ARIQ2 1:273-1Punt7–3
LACQ2 0:14320End of half7–3
ARIQ3 15:00928Field goal10–3
LACQ3 10:0723Turnover10–3
ARIQ3 9:42624Turnover10–3
LACQ3 7:1315109Touchdown10–10
ARIQ4 14:19622Punt10–10
LACQ4 11:20425Punt10–10
ARIQ4 9:49968Touchdown17–10
LACQ4 6:00982Touchdown17–17
ARIQ4 1:54850Field goal20–17
LACQ4 0:0100End of half20–17

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer19/3124112

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Pittman18442.41
Thomas Jones5224.40
Jake Plummer155.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +74.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%2.6%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

4.73%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.7%

Expected total

44.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.09
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.47

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.