2014 · Week 1

Final

Chargers

San Diego

QB Philip Rivers

17·18

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -3

Total

45.5

Model margin

+4.3est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Chargers

Cardinals

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SD lead 5–4 since 1999

ARI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.7 points. ARI are 5-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1ARI @ LAC26–14ARI
2024 · W7LAC @ ARI15–17ARI
2022 · W12LAC @ ARI25–24CHARGERS
2018 · W12ARI @ LAC10–45CHARGERS
2010 · W4ARI @ SD10–41CHARGERS
2006 · W17ARI @ SD20–27CHARGERS
2002 · W3SD @ ARI23–15CHARGERS
2001 · W11ARI @ SD20–17ARI

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSD–ARI
ARIQ1 15:00625Punt0–0
LACQ1 12:20623Punt0–0
ARIQ1 8:32368Turnover0–0
LACQ1 6:57625Punt0–0
ARIQ1 4:08722Punt0–0
LACQ1 1:4136Punt0–0
ARIQ1 0:10650Field goal0–3
LACQ2 12:4266Punt0–3
ARIQ2 9:2937Punt0–3
LACQ2 7:1834Field goal3–3
ARIQ2 6:0049Punt3–3
LACQ2 3:22944Turnover3–3
ARIQ2 0:16230Field goal3–6
LACQ3 15:00780Touchdown10–6
ARIQ3 11:38821Turnover10–6
LACQ3 6:43329Touchdown17–6
ARIQ3 5:2636Punt17–6
LACQ3 3:4437Punt17–6
ARIQ3 2:131159Touchdown17–12
LACQ4 12:301046Punt17–12
ARIQ4 6:501195Touchdown17–18
LACQ4 2:25520Turnover on downs17–18
ARIQ4 1:49312End of half17–18

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer24/3730420

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Andre Ellington13534.10
Carson Palmer4297.30
Jonathan Dwyer7202.90
Stepfan Taylor155.00
Michael Floyd122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

7.49%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.6%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.74
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+2.56
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.31

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.