Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2018 · Week 12

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Josh Rosen

10·45

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Philip Rivers

StubHub Center · outdoors · grass · 74°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

LAC -14

Total

43.5

Model margin

+6.8est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapChargers
  • -0.240EPA / play+0.126
  • 35.6%Success rate47.0%
  • -0.267EPA / dropback+0.211
  • -0.193EPA / rush+0.001
  • 6.0%Explosive rate12.5%
  • -7.13CPOE+3.54
  • 29.0%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 63.9%Red-zone TD rate70.7%
  • 0.92Points / drive2.31
  • 3.0%Turnover rate1.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 5–4 since 1999

ARI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.7 points. LAC are 4-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1ARI @ LAC2614ARI
2024 · W7LAC @ ARI1517ARI
2022 · W12LAC @ ARI2524CHARGERS
2014 · W1SD @ ARI1718ARI
2010 · W4ARI @ SD1041CHARGERS
2006 · W17ARI @ SD2027CHARGERS
2002 · W3SD @ ARI2315CHARGERS
2001 · W11ARI @ SD2017ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh Rosen12/1910511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson17633.70
Chase Edmonds500.00
Josh Rosen2-1-0.50

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Philip Rivers28/2925930
Geno Smith0/3000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Melvin Gordon10616.12
Justin Jackson7578.10
Austin Ekeler5357.01
Detrez Newsome4153.80
Geno Smith372.30
Philip Rivers133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +147.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%2.6%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

3.23%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.8%

Expected total

43.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+5.01
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.75