2022 · Week 12

Final

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

25·24

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kyler Murray

State Farm Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

LAC -2.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

-1.3est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Chargersedge mapCardinals
  • +0.007EPA / play-0.081
  • 44.1%Success rate40.7%
  • +0.037EPA / dropback-0.079
  • -0.057EPA / rush-0.084
  • 6.9%Explosive rate6.3%
  • +1.13CPOE-1.70
  • 43.5%Third-down rate35.4%
  • 55.9%Red-zone TD rate59.7%
  • 1.97Points / drive1.60
  • 1.5%Turnover rate2.0%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 5–4 since 1999

ARI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.7 points. ARI are 5-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1ARI @ LAC2614ARI
2024 · W7LAC @ ARI1517ARI
2018 · W12ARI @ LAC1045CHARGERS
2014 · W1SD @ ARI1718ARI
2010 · W4ARI @ SD1041CHARGERS
2006 · W17ARI @ SD2027CHARGERS
2002 · W3SD @ ARI2315CHARGERS
2001 · W11ARI @ SD2017ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert35/4727430

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Justin Herbert4389.50
Austin Ekeler5204.00
Joshua Kelley242.00
Isaiah Spiller231.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
DeAndre Carter710731
Austin Ekeler1115601
Josh Palmer57560
Keenan Allen57491
Gerald Everett44180
Joshua Kelley23160
Isaiah Spiller1120

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyler Murray18/2919121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Conner251204.80
Kyler Murray7568.01
Keaontay Ingram252.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.52.9%4.6%3.0%7.5%7.2%2.8%4.2%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

45.5%

Expected total

43.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.97
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin-1.34