2001 · Week 11 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jim Miller

13·6

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -3

Total

45

Model margin

-0.4est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

7.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.063EPA / play-0.050
  • 39.4%Success rate42.2%
  • -0.033EPA / dropback-0.012
  • -0.099EPA / rush-0.133
  • 7.6%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 33.3%Third-down rate42.5%
  • 52.2%Red-zone TD rate49.2%
  • 1.28Points / drive1.40
  • 2.1%Turnover rate3.7%
  • -0.146EPA / play allowed+0.044

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jim Miller10/219700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Allen271074.00
Leon Johnson23517.51
Jim Miller100.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
David Terrell23510
Dez White48320
Marty Booker3590
James Allen1350
Fred Baxter0100

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper26/4620901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett12756.30
Daunte Culpepper7436.10
Doug Chapman242.00
Travis Prentice100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

7.31%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.0%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.88
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin-0.39