2001 · Week 15

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jim Miller

20·15

Commanders

Washington

QB Tony Banks

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 51°F · wind 14mph

Closing spread

WAS -1

Total

33

Model margin

+1.8est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.063EPA / play-0.103
  • 39.4%Success rate38.9%
  • -0.033EPA / dropback-0.101
  • -0.099EPA / rush-0.105
  • 7.6%Explosive rate8.6%
  • 33.3%Third-down rate34.9%
  • 52.2%Red-zone TD rate43.9%
  • 1.28Points / drive1.18
  • 2.1%Turnover rate2.3%
  • -0.146EPA / play allowed-0.069

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. WAS are 10-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jim Miller13/269800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Anthony Thomas24823.40
Leon Johnson23417.01
James Allen263.00
Jim Miller300.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Marty Booker713740
Dez White2350
David Terrell1340
James Allen0100
John Davis0100
Anthony Thomas11-10

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks23/4323600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis22572.61
Ki-Jana Carter5285.60
Tony Banks144.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%2.9%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.0%

Expected total

42.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.74
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.82