Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2019 · Week 3

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Mitch Trubisky

31·15

Commanders

Washington

QB Case Keenum

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 87°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

CHI -5

Total

41

Model margin

-0.3est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

1.9%est.

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.079EPA / play-0.130
  • 41.1%Success rate38.8%
  • -0.020EPA / dropback-0.110
  • -0.188EPA / rush-0.164
  • 6.0%Explosive rate8.3%
  • -1.71CPOE-2.94
  • 36.4%Third-down rate29.0%
  • 55.7%Red-zone TD rate55.3%
  • 1.50Points / drive1.49
  • 1.7%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. WAS are 10-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS
2010 · W7WAS @ CHI1714WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mitchell Trubisky25/3123131

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Montgomery13675.20
Cordarrelle Patterson4143.50
Taylor Gabriel177.00
Mike Davis122.00
Mitchell Trubisky122.00
Tarik Cohen4-2-0.50

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Case Keenum30/4333223

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson12373.10
Chris Thompson7294.10
Case Keenum231.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -52.7%4.5%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.86%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.3%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.01
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.27