Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2015 · Week 14

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Kirk Cousins

24·21

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 62°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

CHI -4

Total

42.5

Model margin

-0.0est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

2.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapBears
  • +0.022EPA / play-0.020
  • 42.6%Success rate42.8%
  • +0.166EPA / dropback+0.051
  • -0.191EPA / rush-0.113
  • 7.9%Explosive rate8.8%
  • +5.62CPOE+1.51
  • 43.9%Third-down rate42.3%
  • 61.3%Red-zone TD rate59.4%
  • 1.81Points / drive1.74
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. CHI are 5-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS
2010 · W7WAS @ CHI1714WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins24/3130011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Jones18623.40
Alfred Morris11242.21
Kirk Cousins4133.31

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler19/3131520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte10454.51
Jeremy Langford11373.40
Jay Cutler155.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Alshon Jeffery691071
Zach Miller56851
Marc Mariani23370
Deonte Thompson11360
Jeremy Langford37270
Eddie Royal12150
Matt Forte1280
Khari Lee0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +42.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.4%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.45%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.0%

Expected total

45.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.58
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin-0.01