Closing spread
PIT -8
Total
33.5
Model margin
-0.4est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
1.9%est.
Win probability
- Bengals
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.060EPA / play-0.090
- 42.5%Success rate39.0%
- +0.159EPA / dropback-0.080
- -0.039EPA / rush-0.106
- 11.5%Explosive rate6.9%
- 45.8%Third-down rate37.7%
- 45.4%Red-zone TD rate46.6%
- 1.58Points / drive0.98
- 1.9%Turnover rate3.1%
- -0.148EPA / play allowed-0.112
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 41–16 since 1999
PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. CIN are 18-38-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 14:47 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 13:16 | 11 | 86 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 7:53 | 3 | 77 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 6:22 | 6 | 9 | Turnover on downs | 7–0 |
| PIT | Q1 3:53 | 3 | 45 | Touchdown | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q1 2:43 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q1 1:47 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 14–0 |
| CIN | Q1 0:56 | 10 | 78 | Missed field goal | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q2 11:08 | 10 | 55 | Opp touchdown | 14–7 |
| CIN | Q2 4:41 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 14–7 |
| PIT | Q2 4:41 | 8 | 34 | Field goal | 17–7 |
| CIN | Q2 1:00 | 8 | 48 | Field goal | 17–10 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 17–10 |
| CIN | Q3 13:50 | 14 | 59 | Turnover on downs | 17–10 |
| PIT | Q3 8:37 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 17–10 |
| CIN | Q3 6:04 | 1 | 1 | Turnover | 17–10 |
| PIT | Q3 5:55 | 6 | 53 | Touchdown | 23–10 |
| CIN | Q3 3:41 | 2 | 3 | Turnover | 23–10 |
| PIT | Q3 2:40 | 3 | 5 | Turnover | 23–10 |
| CIN | Q3 0:54 | 7 | 44 | Punt | 23–10 |
| PIT | Q4 13:16 | 4 | 9 | Punt | 23–10 |
| CIN | Q4 11:08 | 7 | 26 | Turnover on downs | 23–10 |
| PIT | Q4 8:38 | 5 | 5 | Turnover | 23–10 |
| CIN | Q4 6:12 | 5 | 18 | Turnover on downs | 23–10 |
| PIT | Q4 5:09 | 3 | -1 | Turnover | 23–10 |
| CIN | Q4 3:54 | 7 | 27 | Touchdown | 23–17 |
| PIT | Q4 2:46 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 23–17 |
| CIN | Q4 2:41 | 13 | 61 | Touchdown | 23–23 |
| PIT | Q4 0:37 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 23–23 |
| CIN | Q4 0:10 | 1 | -1 | End of half | 23–23 |
| PIT | OT | 9 | 23 | Punt | 23–23 |
| CIN | OT | 10 | 86 | Field goal | 23–26 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kordell Stewart | 19/35 | 251 | 3 | 4 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala | 25 | 55 | 2.2 | 0 |
| Hines Ward | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaxico Burress | 6 | 10 | 102 | 2 |
| Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala | 5 | 5 | 50 | 1 |
| Hines Ward | 3 | 7 | 42 | 0 |
| Troy Edwards | 2 | 3 | 25 | 0 |
| Bobby Shaw | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Jerame Tuman | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Kitna | 35/68 | 411 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Dillon | 21 | 91 | 4.3 | 0 |
| Brandon Bennett | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 0 |
| Jon Kitna | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnay Scott | 7 | 12 | 113 | 0 |
| Peter Warrick | 10 | 20 | 109 | 0 |
| T.J. Houshmandzadeh | 9 | 15 | 98 | 0 |
| Danny Farmer | 2 | 4 | 33 | 1 |
| Chad Johnson | 2 | 7 | 25 | 0 |
| Brandon Bennett | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Ron Dugans | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Kirk McMullen | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
1.95%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
47.9%
Expected total
42.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.01
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-0.44



