Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2001 · Week 17 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

17·20

Commanders

Washington

QB Tony Banks

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 40°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

WAS -3.5

Total

36.5

Model margin

+3.2est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.028EPA / play-0.103
  • 39.3%Success rate38.9%
  • +0.073EPA / dropback-0.101
  • -0.182EPA / rush-0.105
  • 8.5%Explosive rate8.6%
  • 28.9%Third-down rate34.9%
  • 48.3%Red-zone TD rate43.9%
  • 1.12Points / drive1.18
  • 2.4%Turnover rate2.3%
  • +0.014EPA / play allowed-0.069

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer11/2515401

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones7263.71
Michael Pittman8192.40
Jake Plummer200.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks13/2515411
Kent Graham1/1800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis381483.91
Ki-Jana Carter3248.00
Tony Banks581.60
Kent Graham3-2-0.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.9%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.6%

Expected total

43.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.62
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.18