Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2017 · Week 15

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Blaine Gabbert

15·20

Commanders

Washington

QB Kirk Cousins

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 50°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

WAS -4

Total

40

Model margin

+3.9est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

2.6%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.129EPA / play-0.051
  • 38.8%Success rate40.8%
  • -0.086EPA / dropback+0.041
  • -0.207EPA / rush-0.203
  • 7.2%Explosive rate9.1%
  • -4.25CPOE+1.00
  • 35.7%Third-down rate32.5%
  • 52.2%Red-zone TD rate64.7%
  • 1.20Points / drive1.61
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS
2008 · W3ARI @ WAS1724WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Blaine Gabbert16/4118901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kerwynn Williams17613.60
Blaine Gabbert6284.70
J.J. Nelson177.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins18/2619620

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Samaje Perine14372.60
Kapri Bibbs263.00
LeShun Daniels122.00
Kirk Cousins200.00
Josh Doctson1-14-14.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jamison Crowder57551
Kapri Bibbs44471
Samaje Perine22290
Ryan Grant23200
Vernon Davis25180
Josh Doctson24160
Niles Paul11110

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +43.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.6%

Expected total

41.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.78
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment+2.97
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.93