Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2011 · Week 2

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kevin Kolb

21·22

Commanders

Washington

QB Rex Grossman

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 66°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

WAS -4.5

Total

44.5

Model margin

-0.6est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.077EPA / play-0.058
  • 41.4%Success rate41.9%
  • -0.076EPA / dropback-0.048
  • -0.078EPA / rush-0.076
  • 7.8%Explosive rate8.9%
  • -5.82CPOE-1.12
  • 32.0%Third-down rate36.9%
  • 56.6%Red-zone TD rate47.2%
  • 1.38Points / drive1.48
  • 3.1%Turnover rate3.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2008 · W3ARI @ WAS1724WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kevin Kolb17/3025121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Wells14936.61
Chester Taylor100.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Larry Fitzgerald791331
Jeff King22361
Andre Roberts37300
Chansi Stuckey23240
Early Doucet26200
Todd Heap1180
Chris Wells0200

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Rex Grossman25/4329122

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower20964.80
Roy Helu10747.40
Rex Grossman4-5-1.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +4.52.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

1.82%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.4%

Expected total

43.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.52
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.58
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.62