2001 · Week 17

Final

Jets

New York

QB Vinny Testaverde

24·22

Raiders

Oakland

QB Rich Gannon

Network Associates Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 55°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

OAK -4.5

Total

41.5

Model margin

+2.7est.

OAK perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Raiders
  • Jets

How each play moved the game.

Raiders winsJets wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

OAK lead 11–8 since 1999

RAIDERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45.1 points. OAK are 9-8-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W10NYJ @ LV1216RAIDERS
2020 · W13LV @ NYJ3128RAIDERS
2019 · W12OAK @ NYJ334NYJ
2017 · W2NYJ @ OAK2045RAIDERS
2015 · W8NYJ @ OAK2034RAIDERS
2014 · W1OAK @ NYJ1419NYJ
2013 · W14OAK @ NYJ2737NYJ
2011 · W3NYJ @ OAK2434RAIDERS

Box score

Individual performances

Jets

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Vinny Testaverde18/2923012

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Curtis Martin16503.10
LaMont Jordan14646.01
Vinny Testaverde3-1-0.30

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Laveranues Coles571111
Wayne Chrebet57830
Kevin Swayne12150
Curtis Martin3580
Anthony Becht1240
Santana Moss0200

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +4.54.0%2.7%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Jets.

Half-point at risk

1.94%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.2%

Expected total

44.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.10
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.66

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.