Closing spread
OAK -4.5
Total
41.5
Model margin
+2.7est.
OAK perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Raiders
- Jets
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
The rivalry
OAK lead 12–8 since 1999
RAIDERS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 46.4 points. OAK are 10-8-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYJ–OAK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYJ | Q1 15:00 | 2 | 54 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| LV | Q1 14:03 | 6 | 19 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYJ | Q1 10:21 | 6 | 5 | Punt | 7–0 |
| LV | Q1 6:37 | 5 | 41 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| NYJ | Q1 3:53 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LV | Q1 1:38 | 10 | 68 | Touchdown | 7–9 |
| NYJ | Q2 11:17 | 4 | 30 | Punt | 7–9 |
| LV | Q2 9:01 | 5 | 23 | Punt | 7–9 |
| NYJ | Q2 7:04 | 5 | 28 | Punt | 7–9 |
| LV | Q2 4:12 | 3 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 14–9 |
| NYJ | Q2 2:48 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 14–9 |
| LV | Q2 2:48 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 14–9 |
| NYJ | Q2 1:45 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 14–9 |
| LV | Q2 1:35 | 2 | 23 | Touchdown | 14–16 |
| NYJ | Q2 0:57 | 3 | 4 | End of half | 14–16 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 39 | Field goal | 14–19 |
| NYJ | Q3 12:07 | 3 | 55 | Touchdown | 21–19 |
| LV | Q3 10:42 | 10 | 64 | Missed field goal | 21–19 |
| NYJ | Q3 4:56 | 6 | 35 | Turnover | 21–19 |
| LV | Q3 2:55 | 3 | 14 | Punt | 21–19 |
| NYJ | Q3 1:38 | 9 | 56 | Turnover | 21–19 |
| LV | Q4 11:32 | 10 | 31 | Field goal | 21–22 |
| NYJ | Q4 6:05 | 4 | 6 | Punt | 21–22 |
| LV | Q4 3:12 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 21–22 |
| NYJ | Q4 2:12 | 7 | 29 | Field goal | 24–22 |
| LV | Q4 0:59 | 4 | 0 | Turnover on downs | 24–22 |
| NYJ | Q4 0:29 | 1 | -1 | End of half | 24–22 |
Box score
Individual performances
Jets
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinny Testaverde | 18/29 | 230 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Martin | 16 | 50 | 3.1 | 0 |
| LaMont Jordan | 1 | 46 | 46.0 | 1 |
| Vinny Testaverde | 3 | -1 | -0.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laveranues Coles | 5 | 7 | 111 | 1 |
| Wayne Chrebet | 5 | 7 | 83 | 0 |
| Kevin Swayne | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
| Curtis Martin | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
| Anthony Becht | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Santana Moss | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Jets.
Half-point at risk
1.94%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.2%
Expected total
44.7est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.10
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.66
One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.