Closing spread
NYJ -3
Total
43.5
Model margin
+0.8est.
OAK perspective
Push chance
7.3%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Jets
- OutBilal PowellRBAnkle· DNP
- OutCalvin PryorSAnkle· DNP
- OutDevin SmithWRAnkle· DNP
- DoubtfulNick MangoldCNeck· DNP
- QuestionableBuster SkrineCBShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableEric DeckerWRKnee· Limited
- QuestionableWillie ColonGKnee· Limited
- DNPChris OwusuWRConcussion
- ProbableBreno GiacominiTThumb· Full
- ProbableChris IvoryRBHamstring· Full
- ProbableDexter McDougleCBHand· Full
- ProbableDion BaileySHip· Full
- ProbableLeonard WilliamsDEKnee· Full
- ProbableMarcus WilliamsCBHamstring· Full
- ProbableRyan QuigleyPright Shin· Full
Raiders
- OutNeiron BallLBKnee· DNP
- ProbableCharles WoodsonSShoulder· Full
- ProbableDenico AutryDTConcussion· Full
- ProbableJustin EllisDTAnkle· Full
- ProbableKeith McGillCBFoot· Full
- ProbableT.J. CarrieCBShoulder· Full
Win probability
- Raiders
- Jets
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
The rivalry
OAK lead 11–8 since 1999
RAIDERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45.1 points. OAK are 9-8-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYJ–OAK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYJ | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 63 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| LV | Q1 7:16 | 10 | 68 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| NYJ | Q1 1:56 | 4 | 5 | Punt | 3–7 |
| LV | Q1 0:23 | 10 | 76 | Touchdown | 3–14 |
| NYJ | Q2 9:37 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 3–14 |
| LV | Q2 7:52 | 5 | 78 | Touchdown | 3–21 |
| NYJ | Q2 5:11 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 3–21 |
| LV | Q2 5:02 | 6 | 31 | Missed field goal | 3–21 |
| NYJ | Q2 2:13 | 7 | 43 | Field goal | 6–21 |
| LV | Q2 0:40 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 6–21 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 93 | Touchdown | 6–28 |
| NYJ | Q3 11:06 | 9 | 80 | Touchdown | 13–28 |
| LV | Q3 7:19 | 4 | 31 | Field goal | 13–31 |
| NYJ | Q3 5:45 | 5 | 21 | Punt | 13–31 |
| LV | Q3 3:01 | 10 | 75 | Field goal | 13–34 |
| NYJ | Q4 12:49 | 11 | 57 | Touchdown | 20–34 |
| LV | Q4 8:37 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 20–34 |
| NYJ | Q4 7:34 | 7 | 27 | Turnover on downs | 20–34 |
| LV | Q4 5:33 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 20–34 |
| NYJ | Q4 4:42 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 20–34 |
| LV | Q4 3:19 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 20–34 |
| NYJ | Q4 2:54 | 11 | 60 | Turnover on downs | 20–34 |
| LV | Q4 0:23 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 20–34 |
Box score
Individual performances
Jets
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith | 27/42 | 265 | 2 | 1 |
| Ryan Fitzpatrick | 4/5 | 46 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 |
| Chris Ivory | 15 | 17 | 1.1 | 0 |
| Ryan Fitzpatrick | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 |
| Zac Stacy | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Marshall | 9 | 18 | 108 | 0 |
| Jeremy Kerley | 4 | 5 | 63 | 0 |
| Eric Decker | 6 | 7 | 60 | 1 |
| Kenbrell Thompkins | 6 | 7 | 41 | 0 |
| Chris Ivory | 3 | 5 | 24 | 0 |
| Jeff Cumberland | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
| Zac Stacy | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Kellen Davis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Jets.
Half-point at risk
7.26%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
51.2%
Expected total
43.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.70
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.79
One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.



