2003 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Kordell Stewart

13·24

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -9

Total

44.5

Model margin

+5.0est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

1.3%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.100EPA / play+0.079
  • 38.3%Success rate45.9%
  • -0.156EPA / dropback+0.164
  • -0.016EPA / rush-0.044
  • 7.4%Explosive rate9.7%
  • 33.9%Third-down rate46.9%
  • 54.5%Red-zone TD rate62.7%
  • 1.44Points / drive1.96
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.013EPA / play allowed-0.008

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kordell Stewart13/2113710
Chris Chandler1/2801

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Anthony Thomas10535.30
Kordell Stewart6254.20
Rabih Abdullah122.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper20/2621420

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Moe Williams211085.11
Onterrio Smith9475.20
Kelly Campbell11919.00
Daunte Culpepper7172.40
Randy Moss11111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +96.4%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.29%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.3%

Expected total

45.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.43
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.99