2003 · Week 14

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

7·34

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

SEA -1

Total

52.5

Model margin

+2.5est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapVikings
  • +0.070EPA / play+0.079
  • 46.1%Success rate45.9%
  • +0.148EPA / dropback+0.164
  • -0.039EPA / rush-0.044
  • 10.5%Explosive rate9.7%
  • 46.8%Third-down rate46.9%
  • 68.2%Red-zone TD rate62.7%
  • 1.98Points / drive1.96
  • 2.4%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.012EPA / play allowed-0.008

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46.5 points. MIN are 7-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W13MIN @ SEA026SEA
2024 · W16MIN @ SEA2724MIN
2021 · W3SEA @ MIN1730MIN
2020 · W5MIN @ SEA2627SEA
2019 · W13MIN @ SEA3037SEA
2018 · W14MIN @ SEA721SEA
2015 · playoffsSEA @ MIN109SEA
2015 · W13SEA @ MIN387SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck17/3421802

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander14564.01
Koren Robinson1-1-1.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper21/3327430

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett251034.10
Onterrio Smith44010.00
Moe Williams8283.50
Daunte Culpepper571.40

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -14.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

2.10%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.9%

Expected total

46.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.02
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.55